Kitzijoxikil NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite ruma Giorgio Maone
2,358 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Nicholas Valentine, pred 7 leti
- Rated 3 out of 5ruma JP, pred 7 letiWas having a lot of trouble with it at first. The noscript button was working for a bit, then stopped working which may have been due to a FF update as far as I could tell on the noscript site? Restarting the browser fixed that particular issue but other things weren't working.
I removed noscript from the add-ons and then went to https://noscript.net/getit and installed from there and it seems to have fixed a majority of the problems as well as cleaned up the UI a bit. I suggest everyone give that a try as well. Just seems there's still bugs to work out and I'm glad to continue to stick with it. - Rated 5 out of 5ruma Welker, pred 7 leti
- Rated 3 out of 5ruma The Lieutenant, pred 7 letiThe extension is still great, but the new UI is absolutely horrible.
- Rated 2 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13510381, pred 7 letiUsed it for Years.
The new Version doesn't work properly.
UMatrix is an alternative. - Rated 2 out of 5ruma radiofree, pred 7 letiAlla fine ho deciso di fare un downgrade alla ultyima versione fi Firefox 56.
Con la v.10 di Noscipt , a parte della complicazione del nuovo menú, molte pagine non caricano correctamente incluso se si permette JavaScript globalmente. Chissa la nuova API non permette il ritorno all'interfaccia calssica?
Spero poter tornare ad usare Nocript prossimamente perche è chiaro che non sarà sicuro continuare con FF 56,02 a lungo.
Grazie comunque per i'ottima estensione che è stata fino a pochi gg fà. - Rated 1 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13499217, pred 7 leti
- Rated 3 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13509908, pred 7 leti
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13509901, pred 7 leti
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13509806, pred 7 leti
- Rated 3 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13509796, pred 7 letiI understood the previous version of NoScript.
I do not understand this version. It is not clear what is going on, or what the icon colours mean. Red versus green seems to be disconnected from permitted and not permitted.
I need documentation. The alternative in the latest version of FireFox is uMatrix, which I have on one machine. It is Very Complicated, but I did find complete documentation for it.
To use NoScript 10.1.1 or later I must have documentation. - Rated 3 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13509040, pred 7 leti3 stars becauze of new Quantum firefox UI, before it it was just perfect, now it is just pure-brainfuck. I will welcome that weed which was smoked while making this nature-fatal-error UI. oh, and TOR still keeps old-fashined perfect UI <3
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma PET-FOX, pred 7 leti
- Rated 2 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13508642, pred 7 leti
- Rated 2 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13508459, pred 7 leti
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 12674645, pred 7 leti
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13508328, pred 7 letiI am still on FF 56 and generally happy with NoScript. After checking the FF57 status and reading what others wrote I felt compelled to do two things. First, I sent a complaint to Mozilla directly - not just about NoScript, but the whole debacle that the move to webextenions has become. They knew this would happen and let the train wreck continue any way.
Second, I am really disappointed at the vitriol directed at this developer. Most, if not all, of the blame is with Mozilla and that is where you should be directing your anger. Things that could be done pre 57 are no longer either a) allowed or b) possible or c) both.
I don't doubt that he is disappointed and angry too. One of the, if not the, most poplular extensions for years, and now kicked to the curb through little fault of his own. I'm sure he will continue to try to make it better but what is 'better' in 57+ will not ever be the same as the older versions. - Rated 4 out of 5ruma Reindl Harald, pred 7 letithe android version don't block anything on FF57 and the UI on the desktop has ugly scrollbars here
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13507805, pred 7 letiThe old version was amazing, truly a power user's addon. The new version... well I understand that you had to rush a complete redesign and rewrite... but it's too bad that it lost a lot of functionality. On the up-side, I do like the new interface.
In particular I'd like to point out that the addon does not work in Private Browsing mode. Would it be possible to add back the Temporary Permissions feature and allow people to "Temporarily Allow" URL's for the duration of Private Browsing sessions? - Rated 2 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13507402, pred 7 letiNew addon for Firefox Quantum is bad. Why is log.js open always. I always get 1.000 notification on console and it takes more CPU usage. New interface is worse than old one. I can't understand which domain is blocked or allowed.
I want old interface an system back. If you can't do same. Do it similar. Or work with good interface designer. I don't want to delete this add-on.
I hope you can fix all problems soon. - Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13507298, pred 7 letiVery useful extension. Happy to see the developer listened to our feedback.
- Rated 2 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13507242, pred 7 letiHey guys, even the new gui is not comfortable as it used to be and so on...please consider this as a free addon and how much time is needed to update it concerning the new quantum firefox code - just give it some time and a fair chance instead of bashing around - giorgio, please go on with your good work, so we can all benefit from noscript again
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13507221, pred 7 leti
- Rated 3 out of 5ruma photografx, pred 7 letiThank you very much for your effort to make this work with "Quantum (57+)".
But please give us back some oft the ofunctionality and ease of use of the old version.
e.g. temporary allowing scripts
cheers