Kitzijoxikil NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite ruma Giorgio Maone
2,361 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 16195434, 5 år sidan
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma progan01, 5 år sidanUp until Firefox 79, NoScript was an indispensable part of my security suite, handling intrusions and trouble scripts very well. But now either Firefox or NoScript does not remember my instructions from one session to the next, forcing me to re-approve privileges each time I revisit a site. I don't know why this is happening, but it's an enormous hindrance and a great timesuck. Can you look into this for me, Giorgio? Your product has been a Godsend to me, and I want to continue using it.
Tzolin rutzij b'anonel
xtalüx rutzijol 5 år sidanIt's most likely this CCleaner bug: https://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - Rated 1 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 16184636, 5 år sidan
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Zitronella, 5 år sidanNoScript works perfect also on firefox 79.0
If it doesn't remember settings the reason could be CCleaner > Custom Clean > Applications > Firefox > “Internet Cache” option deletes all *.sqlite-shm, *.sqlite-wal,
see
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/07/09/changes-to-storage-sync-in-firefox-79/#comment-226931
That’s a bug in CCleaner, not in NoScript and not in Firefox.Tzolin rutzij b'anonel
xtalüx rutzijol 5 år sidanhttps://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - Rated 5 out of 5ruma nenas1ya, 5 år sidan
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 16136545, 5 år sidan
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 16103032, 5 år sidan
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 15819827, 5 år sidan
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma Jaga, 5 år sidanWorks perfectly on all websites used. All pages loads slower than usual time.
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma singh, 5 år sidan
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma smluuvslm, 5 år sidan
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Pieta, 5 år sidan
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma gep23, 5 år sidanOne of my best ratings. Recently, however, the permissions are no longer saved and I have to reassign them almost every session.
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma user 735972, 5 år sidan
- Rated 4 out of 5ruma theone, 5 år sidan
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14601750, 5 år sidan
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Татьяна, 5 år sidan
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma visika, 5 år sidan
- Rated 3 out of 5ruma Dragganot33, 5 år sidan
- Rated 2 out of 5ruma MSpan, 5 år sidan
- Rated 1 out of 5ruma GT, 5 år sidan
- Rated 3 out of 5ruma Andralon, 5 år sidana script that is marked "trusted" on one page, is also trusted on every other page, which is the same as "trusted globally".
if "disable restrictions globally (dangerous)" is
"dangerous" (in the programmers opinion), why is the "trusted" not bound to the specific page?
- page A does work without script X
- page B doesn't work without script X
(e.g. doubleclick, googleanalytics, googlestatics)
why would i want to allow script X on page A?