Kitzijoxikil NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite ruma Giorgio Maone
1,686 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14083114, 7 anni fathank you ! very useful and must-have extension for max security
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14325950, 7 anni faI have been a continuous user for more than 8 years. Initially I needed security support when accessing financial data on the web. More recently I have referred to and taken action from NoScript warnings when visiting a much wider range of sites. NoScript has never let me down!
Thanks must go to Giorgio and his team for his impressive app. Tzolin rutzij b'anonel
xtalüx rutzijol 7 anni faJust FYI: "unlimited storage" permission is needed by NoScript in order to persist your settings, and more specifically your permissions list which may become very large. Anyway, the full source code repository (with all the changes history) is available here: https://github.com/hackademix/noscript
Hope it helps you stop conjuring theories about the intentions of this extensions.- Rated 5 out of 5ruma digitalcircuit, 7 anni fa
Tzolin rutzij b'anonel
xtalüx rutzijol 7 anni faCouldy ou please report with more details here? Thanks! https://noscript.net/forum- Rated 5 out of 5ruma George Thomas, 7 anni faOne of those "must-have" add-ons. You really need this even if you think you don't
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14114271, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 12950286, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14292288, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14250674, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14290478, 7 anni faModule efficace et indispensable avec une interface très intuitive et esthétique depuis Firefox Quantum.
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14287774, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14284504, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14283637, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Jimmy Montano, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Paramdeo Singh, 7 anni fa
- Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 14275679, 7 anni faUPDATE: It seems, although the Firefox add-ons page was reporting NoScript 10.1.9.4 it may not have been that version causing the issues, although Firefox had been re-started 3 times. Since writing the report (and those 3 re-starts after NoScript updated), the local page issues have now gone. Maybe 10.1.9.4 has to be run more than once for its fixes to the 10.1.9.2 bugs to take effect, and these are only picked up on browser re-start? The incorrect display of < noscript > has gone on the 4th re-start and the NoScript menu now shows a configurable file: domain for the first time since the major upgrade. Thank you for fixing! Changed from 1* to 3* [will be back to 5* if/when fully working].
FURTHER UPDATE: It has been working ok the rest of the day, so looks like the general incompatibility with Firefox 62.0 has also been fixed. Now back to 5* thanks.
ORIGINAL ISSUES [now fixed]:
As others have found, Firefox 62 plus the bad and admitted severe bugs in NoScript 10.1.9.2 have totalled its operation and the only way of using Firefox is to disable NoScript. Where do I start? All issues have been verified by disabling NoScript: without it no issues occur, with it enabled all occur, so it is the sole cause.
First, after a while, as others have reported, Firefox just stops working and will show nothing. From the console, it looks like NoScript has broken the Firefox origin policy on everything. Where is it trying to import scripts from?
The problem, reported on the NoScript forum that pages on local disks are broken since 10.1.9.2 on Firefox 61.0.2 remains. The scripts (used to) run but incorrectly also showed the content of < noscript >. A moderator proved this with a use case but the report has now been deleted. In Firefox 62.0, it is now worse. The page may load once (incorrectly) if you are lucky, then if you reload it stops (previous point). There is no facility in the current UI to specify permission for local pages (I think there was before the big change to the Firefox api)
Somewhere, probably in 10.1.9.2, the user list of allowed and blocked sites has been corrupted. 10.1.9.4 was supposed to fix this and recover the situation but hasn't [on the first or second runs].
As you just seem to delete some issues reported on your forums, please don't ask me to post there. Unless this barrage of severe errors is fixed quickly, the product is now unusable, sorry. I will be sad to have to uninstall it after around 5 years. - Rated 5 out of 5ruma Firefox okisanel 13849996, 7 anni faexcellent script great help. I like it very much. thanks to the developer...