Recenze doplňku Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers od Firefox
Recenze od uživatele Augusto
Hodnocení: 2 z 5
od uživatele Augusto, před 2 letyThe UX is horrible. This extension have a design problem with the "No container" state:
* You can move a website to a container, but you can't take it out of a container.
* Moreover you can't choose "no container" as default state for a website if you have chosen a container previously.
* Also the extension always remember your last container for a website and you aren't able to disable that "feature".
Please review the "Cookie Swap" extension, which is much more simple (but it has some bugs unfortunately).
* You can move a website to a container, but you can't take it out of a container.
* Moreover you can't choose "no container" as default state for a website if you have chosen a container previously.
* Also the extension always remember your last container for a website and you aren't able to disable that "feature".
Please review the "Cookie Swap" extension, which is much more simple (but it has some bugs unfortunately).
7 929 recenzí
- Hodnocení: 4 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 17586361, před 11 hodinami
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 19805267, před dnem
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele diegof59, před 2 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele MOSIMANEWAPULA WHITE TABANE, před 2 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 15082755, před 2 dnyThis is one of the core plugins I use (in addition to Ublock Origin).
With the account sync, containers are also remembered across different computers as well, so I don't have to set up the containers on every new laptop or reinstall of firefox. Sometimes I mistakenly open a website in the wrong container because I don't always map every single website to a container, but most of the time it's a non-issue.
I'm surprised this is still an add-on and not a core Firefox feature. - Hodnocení: 1 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 18184964, před 3 dnyIt doesn't work for me. I cannot create a container where I am logged into Google and simultaneously a container where I'm not logged in.
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele luca_gohan, před 3 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 19799825, před 4 dnyL'add on correspond parfaitement à ce dont j'ai besoin
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 14066212, před 5 dnyA must have, cannot imagine my workflow without it anymore.
- Hodnocení: 4 z 5od uživatele Benjamin MOREAUX, před 7 dnyVery handy for managing multiple M365 or Google tenants.
For me, the only thing missing is the ability to have “private browsing” containers and a way to always open in a container, for example when editing a bookmark. - Hodnocení: 1 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 19794127, před 7 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Fosslite, před 8 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Arie, před 10 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 14150725, před 11 dny
- Hodnocení: 3 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 14541632, před 11 dnyRecently it's been impossible to remove a site from the 'managed site list' - after a short period it re-appears. Perhaps its an integration issue with FF sync, or occurred when FF revamping the profiles management.
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Uživatel Firefoxu - 19787479, před 11 dnyExcellent solution to manage multiple cloud tenant.
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Jawa D. WAI, před 13 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Heruta, před 15 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele fsr, před 16 dnyIt's excellent. Very useful for using the same website with different accounts, like your personal and work accounts.
- Hodnocení: 4 z 5od uživatele altyspa, před 16 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele NeoOne, před 17 dny
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele AjarAdore, před 20 dnyQuite handy once you get the hang of it. I love the ability to purge cookies across a container, very useful. Honestly feel like this should be installed by default and enabled via settings.
- Hodnocení: 1 z 5od uživatele Сырное, před 24 dnySo, what do we have here? A mockery from Firefox. Let's go back to the proxy form - it expects "type://host:ip", but what do we actually get? No SOCKS5 support. I enter "SOCKS5://ip:port", and it complains about an unsupported record type. And the proxy has been verified as working. It simply wouldn't work with any functional proxy.
- Hodnocení: 5 z 5od uživatele Mike Breytentebach, před měsícem