1.045 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon jay, vor 4 JahrenThe idea is great, but unfortunately it breaks some websites! This would not be so much of a problem if it had whitelisting functionality. For now there was no other option for me but to uninstall it again...
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Ulfric, vor 4 JahrenThis was a decent add-on that I forgot about and let run wild, but unfortunately the lack of a whitelist means I cannot get much use out of this anymore. For some reason it recently broke Pocket's inline articles, and I found out from the reviews that it breaks certain features in Gmail as well (which I didn't connect to this add-on until now!). Please add a whitelist, or at least more user flexibility in terms of maneuvering through features that may break important website features.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Case_Of, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Echonly, vor 4 JahrenI uninstalled this extension after using it for more than a day. The default rules have caused me a lot of trouble when browsing the web, and there is no way to set detailed settings.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon 22jjjnn, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon SlyArcher, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17394022, vor 4 JahrenThis ends up breaking several non tracking urls as they sometimes inject history state for functionality.
And the extension doesn't provide a single way to add exceptions and by viewing the github it seems they just plain ignore suggestions.
There is a setting called "The url to the data.json file (rules)" but this does nothing as changing it to several different things still worked in the exact same way.
If you don't use pages that may modify or rely on the url consistency is a great extension but besides that it missing a critical feature. - Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Frans, vor 4 JahrenThis was breaking links from loading, and since this is a "install and forget" type of extension--which is nice, except in this instance--and since there is no link whitelisting, I unfortunately have to disable it. :(
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon aconamos, vor 4 JahrenThis extension works great other than that it has completely broken google OAuth for me. I have had to disable it which sucks because I really like this extension.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Midnight1, vor 4 JahrenThis add on is bugging as hell, blocks some web sites from loading.
Took me a week to figure out what the problem was.
Disable it and all is well.
I uninstalled it!! - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Mister GothFvck, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Soulsurfer, vor 4 Jahrenein äußerst nützliches Add-on, arbeitet unauffällig im Hintergrund und erledigt genau das, was die Entwickler versprechen!
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14108734, vor 4 JahrenNeed the ability to WHITELIST certain URLS. It is either on, or off. And when it breaks a website, I have to turn it off completely. Add this please!
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Arash Yoosefdoost, vor 4 JahrenThe new version causes many problems. For example, it broke Firefox's back and forward buttons in Gmail. Makes Gmail's unique email links invalid and the page will be redirected to the inbox in case of refreshing. It is a new problem.
In addition, it broke many websites such as banks. Also, prevent plugins such as Boomerang to connect to the Gmail account and broke them.
It was a good Firefox add-on but now cases many serious issues. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon WildSnakeNYC, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon moneywiseUpfront, vor 4 JahrenIf Google removed the extension from the Chrome Web Store... Then ClearURLs does its job well.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13938515, vor 4 JahrenSome URLs doesn't work with last release 1.24.1 when they worked with previous release. Must deactivate ClearURLs to access these URLs. Not terrific.
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Dareal Bingoxz, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon tonini, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Aly, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13202285, vor 4 JahrenGreat extension, but it needs a whitelist. Payment portals are sometimes broken.
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Adolf.Markl@gmx.de, vor 4 JahrenWas ist mit "fbclid=" + "gclid=" ?
Vorschlag: einzeln An/Aus für jede Klasse dieser Tracks (utm_.*, fbcl.*=, gclid=, ...)?
außerdem: Whitelist wäre wünschenswert.