Bewertungen für NoScript
NoScript von Giorgio Maone
2.373 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13497938, vor 8 Jahrena must have extension if you care about privacy and security.
Requires some familiarity with the concept of javascript - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Rykum, vor 8 JahrenUpdating my review, now it's works under private tab. UI still needs some work but now it is more clear.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13509230, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Rob Kent, vor 8 JahrenFirstly let me say that I am a long time user of NoScript and I have sent monetary contributions to the developer at least once, possibly more often. It is a *free* addon that obviously takes many hours of work to maintain. The developer should be given thanks and respect for doing that voluntarily. No self-respecting developer sets out to make mistakes or produce something that users don't want.
So something has gone badly wrong with this release. There are two aspects to it that I can see: the script blocking operation, and the UI. Some sites that I visited no longer work with NoScript enabled, even if you allow everything. Amazon music (play sample) didn't work for me, just one example. So that needs sorting out.
As for the UI, I initially found it complicated and confusing but I am getting used to it now. What happened to the middle-click functionality?
But until the developer has managed to fix the functionality, I have to disable it. I may just end up using the Brave browser until it is fixed.
Oh, and I would like a way to save my Whitelist so that I don't lose it if I uninstall and reinstall. - Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Juliano, vor 8 JahrenWow, what went wrong? Mozilla is fucking with everything!!!
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 10244801, vor 8 JahrenMost of what is happening now you should blame on Mozilla, though I have to admit there are several things I don't get with NS' new interface.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon ravendust, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13512679, vor 8 JahrenThanks! Works for me so far. One thing I found a bit tricky is that if one allows a script from a non-https site but without also allowing non-https from the site by clicking on the padlock, then reloading will show the site as "Default", i.e. most of the time as blocked. So it seems as if the allowing of the site was not remembered by no script. I think it would be better to show the site as allowed as one has chosen before since the padlock will give you the further information that it does only allow non-https.
I have seen lots of people saying that no script does not save allowed sites. So far for me the workaround was always to unlock the padlock as well. - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon GringoTM, vor 8 JahrenOttima Estensione fa quello che dice, purchè si capisca come lavora e la si configuri correttamente.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Franz Schneider, vor 8 JahrenThis was a five-star add-on prior! I LOVED it! What happened to the user interface and the options panel with all of its features? This add-on is a mess now.
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13512395, vor 8 JahrenBisogna un po' abituarsi alla nuova interfaccia. Come al solito la pazienza degli utenti non e' un gran che "tutto e subito" imparate ad usarlo e controllate se funziona correttamente a me funziona egregiamente e mi sono gia abituato al nuovo look.
A una cosa dato che e' gratuito se non vi comoda cambiate pure componente aggiuntivo credo che Giorgio sopravvivera'.
TNX. - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon frede_256, vor 8 JahrenEven as a long time user of NoScript this UI absolutely kills the experience.
I still think there is hope though. Something as little as getting the mouse-over menu activation to work would make it feel not nearly as bad.
The new HTTPS detection is also one of the greatest offenders in breaking website functionality and there isn't even a proper explanation for how or why it works. I had to experiment my way to discovering this. - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13512313, vor 8 JahrenWhy does it suck so hard now? It was a good add-on and one of the reasons I use Firefox. Think i give Opera a chance.
Since 10.1.2 Temporarly button is back; it's getting better again. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13511675, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Nicholas Valentine, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon JP, vor 8 JahrenWas having a lot of trouble with it at first. The noscript button was working for a bit, then stopped working which may have been due to a FF update as far as I could tell on the noscript site? Restarting the browser fixed that particular issue but other things weren't working.
I removed noscript from the add-ons and then went to https://noscript.net/getit and installed from there and it seems to have fixed a majority of the problems as well as cleaned up the UI a bit. I suggest everyone give that a try as well. Just seems there's still bugs to work out and I'm glad to continue to stick with it. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Welker, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon The Lieutenant, vor 8 JahrenThe extension is still great, but the new UI is absolutely horrible.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13510381, vor 8 JahrenUsed it for Years.
The new Version doesn't work properly.
UMatrix is an alternative. - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon radiofree, vor 8 JahrenAlla fine ho deciso di fare un downgrade alla ultyima versione fi Firefox 56.
Con la v.10 di Noscipt , a parte della complicazione del nuovo menú, molte pagine non caricano correctamente incluso se si permette JavaScript globalmente. Chissa la nuova API non permette il ritorno all'interfaccia calssica?
Spero poter tornare ad usare Nocript prossimamente perche è chiaro che non sarà sicuro continuare con FF 56,02 a lungo.
Grazie comunque per i'ottima estensione che è stata fino a pochi gg fà. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13499217, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13509908, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13509901, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13509806, vor 8 Jahren