49 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon ee, vor 2 Jahrencannot clear youtube redirect links. heck, it can't even clear the amo redirect links.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon ThanxBiotch, vor 2 JahrenHasn't even tried to fix the sorting problem if used while shopping. Position of ignoring request or criticism disregards the apps' intent. Is this because the data collected is sold to them? Wouldn't that be the instance when "cleaning" would be most useful?
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12719497, vor 2 JahrenBreaks all websites. Apparently also breaks DNS resolvers.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Bazoogle, vor 2 JahrenDesperately needs a whitelist feature. If you want one site to work, you have to disable it entirely, which is far worse than just allowing one URL.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Synetech, vor 2 JahrenThis extensions writes to the drive at least twice per minute. WTH does it have to write? 🤨 I'm not going to wear down my SSD with unnecessary writes from an extension that has no business writing data at all. 😒
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17692673, vor 2 JahrenBreaks some websites without the ability to exclude it.
Example is Firebase "App Distribution" page, which it ruins its ability to just download APK files. - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon goofball, vor 3 JahrenAs many others have said, it does its job but breaks many sites and doesn't support an allow-list to un-break them.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 15286977, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon binaural, vor 3 JahrenWorked really well - until I realised it was breaking a number of sites.
As _everyone_ is writing: this needs an allow list! - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon MrGoatsy, vor 3 JahrenFills up browser history with both the tracked URL and the non tracked URL.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Ulfric, vor 3 JahrenThis was a decent add-on that I forgot about and let run wild, but unfortunately the lack of a whitelist means I cannot get much use out of this anymore. For some reason it recently broke Pocket's inline articles, and I found out from the reviews that it breaks certain features in Gmail as well (which I didn't connect to this add-on until now!). Please add a whitelist, or at least more user flexibility in terms of maneuvering through features that may break important website features.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon aconamos, vor 3 JahrenThis extension works great other than that it has completely broken google OAuth for me. I have had to disable it which sucks because I really like this extension.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Intrepid, vor 4 JahrenNo longer being updated. Bug reports go answered and are not fixed. Causes malfunctions with many websites such as Amazon search result sorting (e.g., Sort by: Price Low to High). No way to exclude websites like you can do with uBlock Origin. ClearURLs would be great if it had this one feature. Without this option, turning it on and off is an annoyance. Sadly, I'm leaving it off, and just using it's right click ability to clean / shorten URLs on an as needed basis. Bummer. Update: Someone responded to the Amazon bug and provided a workaround here:
https://gitlab.com/KevinRoebert/ClearUrls/-/issues/677/ - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon kelendral, vor 4 JahrenWorks OK, but breaks a number of sites and has no option to disable on a per site basis that I found.
As such it became a nuisance having to disable/enable at once or twice a day for important sites. - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Imp, vor 4 JahrenMany elements I'd like to block a to clever to be blocked due to changing URLs. It would be neccessary to add a console with * and ? to add flexible-named URL-parts to be blocked
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16228066, vor 5 JahrenOhne Whitelist macht dieses Add-on keinen Sinn, ist äusserst mühsam immer von Hand bei gewissen URLs das Add-On zu deaktivieren. Entwickler verspricht schon seit Monaten die Implementierung, bis heute gibt es immer noch keine Whitelist.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Craig, vor 5 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon merc1ful, vor 5 JahrenNeed whitelisting feature. It breaks some website that use sort or filter feature
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Shamisen, vor 5 JahrenOverly reliant to the pre-built rules. Don't get me wrong, it's great to have well maintained rules. But on the other hand, there's currently no way to add your own rules or to create exclusion.
So if something is broken or the rules doesn't catch something then you're stuck with it. And before anyone made suggestion to report it via gitlab, the issues there are piling up already. - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 15983988, vor 5 Jahren