Bewertungen für DuckDuckGo Search & Tracker Protection
DuckDuckGo Search & Tracker Protection von DuckDuckGo
2.290 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16507600, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16131795, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Jason DiManna, vor 3 JahrenSwitched from Google originally and really enjoyed. Now public statements of filtering or censoring results disappoints me. Let me be the judge of what is fake news!
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Screw the Narrative, vor 3 JahrenMoving to Brave. I don't want my searches to be "prioritized" based on someone else's opinion of what's true or not. See Ya.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Abraham, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14896160, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13997341, vor 3 JahrenAfter years of using it im done whit DDG... "At DuckDuckGo, we've been rolling out search updates that down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation."
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Free to Decide 1971, vor 3 JahrenI've been a long-time user and supporter of DuckDuckGo - telling friends and family it's a great alternative to Scroogle's manipulation and data tracking. I created an account today just to write a review and voice my displeasure for DDG's new policy of censorship.
I am an adult with the capacity for critical thinking and judging for myself whether someone has provided sufficient evidence to support their claim. I DON'T need and DON'T want a search provider to cultivate, eliminate, or discriminate the results that show up when I am searching for something.
I can no longer in good conscience support DDG, and will start using a different search provider going forward. They lost my support the moment they decided to censor the free flow of information. Even if they reversed their decision tomorrow, it will take some work for them to earn back my trust and support. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17018431, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14047601, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17328013, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon romantic_pessimist, vor 3 JahrenFirst time i review an extension, and it is because it vastly undermined my trust in it. now won't be a major problem for my day to day life, but i'm not gonna embrace and wait till something i might find interesting or useful will be censored.
I'm gonna manually manage my adblock, and privacy setting, even if it suck, i find it essential for my well being to have the most extensive type of freedom i can get - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Ersultan, vor 3 JahrenПо факту собирает данные о пользователях, влияет на результаты поиска. Шлак! Разрабы пиздаболы
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Erolley, vor 3 JahrenNo point in using DDG anymore, it became the same thing as Google, use an alternative instead.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17327004, vor 3 JahrenAI determining what i should see? Duck duck gone to the dustbin of history!
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17326333, vor 3 JahrenSold their soul to SJW politics. To the trash with you.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon BJSully, vor 3 JahrenAt least Google doesn't hide [anymore] the fact it's nothing more than a political censorship entity. DDG is toast.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13343953, vor 3 JahrenUsed to recommend DDG to people and used it myself for years on all my devices. I have now switched to Brave everywhere. Privacy AND anti-censorship.
There is a false dichotomy that being anti-censorship means being Alex Jones 2.0. This makes it easy to dismiss people's complaints
Facebook censored a peer-reviewed articled published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the most respected medical journals. Lack of transparency for how something is branded "fake news" is worrying.
The most respected newspapers promoted the "WMD in Iraq" years ago. But I guess propaganda machine is cool when brown kids are killed instead of those bought by rich couple abroad (see news of kids from paid surrogacy stuck in Ukraine).
I am sure an underpaid intern knows better about what is disinformation and what is true. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon || BeeBee ||, vor 3 JahrenDuckDuckGo used to stand for Internet privacy. You ask us "Why You Should Care" ... guess you are right as it turns out the you don't care much no more since starting to censor search results. You have just lost my confidence reveling that you have become a player in the great narrative. Shame on you guys!
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Eliphaser, vor 3 JahrenI used to really like DuckDuckGo but it joins the elite club of censoring.
The best way to fight disinformation and propaganda is to demistify it, argue it, present it and talk about it, analyse it and present the reality. This is not what DuckDuckGo seems to value. They would much rather down-rank searches from Russian media than let people forge their own opinions on the reality at hand.
A search engine taking party in a conflict is not just a political issue, but a poor sign that the search aspect only responds to what the owners of the engine want you to easily find rather than to leave you with an unfiltered list of what you are really looking for.
Currently, DuckDuckGo's search effectiveness on controversial topics now prove to be similar to that of Google's, with a little bit more privacy powdered onto it. Not exactly worth using anymore, and I certainly don't think they are trustworthy for quality searches if they do things like that. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Elofson, vor 3 JahrenDuckDuckGo is now censoring search content that it considers "misinformation".
Use Brave Search instead. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17015801, vor 3 JahrenI took it off on my computer and smartphone as I don't need a second Google. I don't need someone to tell me what I should look at.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon afb, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon ftnwo2012, vor 3 JahrenDDG représentait un peu une alternative pour un monde librement informé. À présent, en rejetant la Russie, ils rejoignent gogol et autres dans la droite ligne des mondialistes de Davos.
Bye bye ! - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17325015, vor 3 JahrenGabriel Weinberg, CEO, decide for me what I should and shouldn't be able to find when I'm searching for things.
If I wanted to be censored I would use google.
so, I'm out.