Bewertungen für Grammatik- und Rechtschreibprüfung - LanguageTool
Grammatik- und Rechtschreibprüfung - LanguageTool von LanguageTooler GmbH
Bewertungen von Endless Fantasy
Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternen
von Endless Fantasy, vor einem JahrTwo stars for not including an option to select, an “Any dialect” in the which dialect to use dropdown, or select multiple as a bubble, as either a basic or advanced option.
I consider this a critical feature of any language tool, especially a spell check.
I'd also like to be able to select “Show both as a suggestion” For these features of premium let alone recommend it as a user I want more freedom of expression in how I type, sometimes to type in standard “wrong” variations and even recommend them (The horror!!!):
Wrong Punctuation
Incorrect Word Combinations
Advanced Missing Commas
Foreign Terms
It's also lacking several important features such as custom dictionaries from what I can tell.
There's no excuse for not loading from standard formats for this.
Review was edited using this software.
The software also disguises telling you about "Advanced" errors, as a form of very blatant advertisement, and front-loads its AI paraphrasing, and rewriting system as much as it reasonably can without impacting the user experience.
As a user I don't want this, I don't want to know if I made an advanced spelling mistake, because I know that The software does not support that because I read the page, I expect no scanning, not ad's for scanning disguised as good faith showcasing of your product, or the user's failures.
It needs to be a default off option like "Enable scanning of user text for premium features, to warn user about their mistakes" would be ideal.
There's not even any options clutter yet, good work, but its not configurable enough.
Id say my review rating is: Stalker HoC's reception.
I consider this a critical feature of any language tool, especially a spell check.
I'd also like to be able to select “Show both as a suggestion” For these features of premium let alone recommend it as a user I want more freedom of expression in how I type, sometimes to type in standard “wrong” variations and even recommend them (The horror!!!):
Wrong Punctuation
Incorrect Word Combinations
Advanced Missing Commas
Foreign Terms
It's also lacking several important features such as custom dictionaries from what I can tell.
There's no excuse for not loading from standard formats for this.
Review was edited using this software.
The software also disguises telling you about "Advanced" errors, as a form of very blatant advertisement, and front-loads its AI paraphrasing, and rewriting system as much as it reasonably can without impacting the user experience.
As a user I don't want this, I don't want to know if I made an advanced spelling mistake, because I know that The software does not support that because I read the page, I expect no scanning, not ad's for scanning disguised as good faith showcasing of your product, or the user's failures.
It needs to be a default off option like "Enable scanning of user text for premium features, to warn user about their mistakes" would be ideal.
There's not even any options clutter yet, good work, but its not configurable enough.
Id say my review rating is: Stalker HoC's reception.
4.776 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 15509759, vor einem Tag
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Cori, vor einem Tag
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Soto, vor 2 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Theeo123, vor 2 TagenTheir recent decision to lock the Firefox extension behind the premium version irks me, but at least self-hosting is pretty easy, and it's still way better than Grammarly
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Mr_Pennywise, vor 2 TagenThis WAS! The best spell checker for the web BUT NOW it is going behind a pay wall sorry but I can NO longer recommend this tool to use
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon PON, vor 2 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19588709, vor 3 TagenEin praktischer Helfer, wobei etwa 95% alle Korrekturvorschläge richtig sind. Spezielle Satzstellungen, wie eine Redensart oder Zitat, werden zum Teil als Fehlerhaft gekennmerkt und lassen sich nicht als Wörterbucheintrag abspeichern.
Ansonsten ist dieses LanguageTool optimal, um Flüchtigkeitsfehler aufzuspüren. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18046396, vor 3 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Albert, vor 3 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19725297, vor 3 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon darkocean, vor 3 TagenIsn't offering any correct sugestions for typos. I can see what the correct spelling is if there's the right one offered, it's just that my fingers refuse to type some words corectly. Lol! Most spell checks are able to correct things like waz (Was) and such so please contine to improve theis (this) spellchecker. If this helps; I tend to bounce off of the wrong key at times usually close to the one I'm trying to hit. Not sure why I do that.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19724827, vor 3 TagenI bought the premium bull..... and since then it went all down the drain.... After 30 minutes of work it slows down the browser like I would work on my toaster but I really have a high high end PC for Gaming and Development
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon DeiKi Celestria, vor 3 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18701555, vor 4 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon SSR, vor 4 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14496809, vor 4 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Afzal, vor 4 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Anton Maminov, vor 5 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14256295, vor 6 TagenI used to use Grammarly, however I now find Language Tool just as good. I proof websites for grammar errors and this tool detects WordPress text boxes where Grammarly sometimes wouldn't. It's my go to tool.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Matthew, vor 6 TagenI understand that the company needs to make money from its work, however wanting 20 € per MONTH for a grammar checker is insane to me. Harper is also open source and free, I switched to that. 20 € per year would be cool, but 240 € is a hard pass. :(
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19719083, vor 6 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18815780, vor 8 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon fanficfool, vor 8 Tagenin 14 days the extension will be premium only and they except you to pay 20 USD a month for this extension
"how many times do we need to teach you this lesson old man?"