Bewertungen für NoScript
NoScript von Giorgio Maone
Bewertungen von jmcken
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
von jmcken, vor 8 JahrenRecently I gave this a 3-star review (I believe the version at the time was 10.1.3 or thereabouts), with my two biggest issues being the dramatic performance impact on certain websites (TweetDeck in particular just froze up for minutes at a time) and the irritating intrusiveness of the XSS popups, especially since it kept forgetting my per-site settings.
I’m happy to report both these issues have since been fixed some time in the last few days – I’ve stopped experiencing freeze-ups, and whilst I’m still a bit annoyed at the XSS popups, now they at least remember my settings so they stop pestering me when I revisit a site afterwards. For these reasons, I’m changing my rating to 5 stars, the same I would have given before the WebExtension update.
Finally, a suggestion about the UI (and unlike too many here, I perfectly understand you can’t bring the old one back). I’m getting used to it and it’s become almost second-nature to use. However, one thing I find somewhat unintuitive about it is the layout of the Default/Trusted/Untrusted/Custom buttons: specifically, how choosing one causes it to expand, taking up space previously used by the other buttons. I always felt it might feel simpler and smoother if the buttons had a static width and all displayed their text labels even when unselected. Then upon clicking one, it would darken or grow brighter or something to show it’s been selected, without changing shape or position.
Just my two cents. I know you’re getting hammered a lot and I sympathize. Your hard work and devotion shows. It’s been bumpy, but the new NoScript is now at a place where I’m happy to use it and recommend it. Please keep up the good work.
I’m happy to report both these issues have since been fixed some time in the last few days – I’ve stopped experiencing freeze-ups, and whilst I’m still a bit annoyed at the XSS popups, now they at least remember my settings so they stop pestering me when I revisit a site afterwards. For these reasons, I’m changing my rating to 5 stars, the same I would have given before the WebExtension update.
Finally, a suggestion about the UI (and unlike too many here, I perfectly understand you can’t bring the old one back). I’m getting used to it and it’s become almost second-nature to use. However, one thing I find somewhat unintuitive about it is the layout of the Default/Trusted/Untrusted/Custom buttons: specifically, how choosing one causes it to expand, taking up space previously used by the other buttons. I always felt it might feel simpler and smoother if the buttons had a static width and all displayed their text labels even when unselected. Then upon clicking one, it would darken or grow brighter or something to show it’s been selected, without changing shape or position.
Just my two cents. I know you’re getting hammered a lot and I sympathize. Your hard work and devotion shows. It’s been bumpy, but the new NoScript is now at a place where I’m happy to use it and recommend it. Please keep up the good work.
2.373 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19072892, vor 6 Stunden
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon cwqing1973, vor 4 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14468519, vor 5 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon rabbitshee, vor 7 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19047433, vor 9 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon A. Bilmanda, vor 12 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Lazer Bear, vor 12 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Sembler, vor 21 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 15056996, vor einem Monatissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon 镂心鉥肝, vor einem MonatNoScript还是很好的,不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过,文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17847461, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18989716, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Max, vor einem MonatI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon LittleFire, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Absinthe, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon thofree, vor 2 MonatenGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18920843, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18315395, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon VonD68, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon luis, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Retromania, vor 2 Monaten