Bewertungen für NoScript
NoScript von Giorgio Maone
Bewertungen von Firefox-Benutzer 13538904
Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen
von Firefox-Benutzer 13538904, vor 8 Jahren#### How I fixed the last noscript problem on Firefox Quantum.
Note: Before considering using this fix, **backup your important Firefox data, such as bookmarks, etc. just in case.**
1st. I went to about:support and I clicked on “Refresh Firefox”. **Watch out, this will remove your default Firefox settings and add-ons.** Once you do this, you have to start from scratch.
2nd. I went to about:addons and I told Firefox not to automatically update add-ons.
3rd. I installed the first noscript version for Firefox Quantum from noscript repositories:
https://secure.informaction.com/download/releases/noscript-10.1.1.xpi
4th. I installed the rest of the add-ons I used to have before.
Note: Before considering using this fix, **backup your important Firefox data, such as bookmarks, etc. just in case.**
1st. I went to about:support and I clicked on “Refresh Firefox”. **Watch out, this will remove your default Firefox settings and add-ons.** Once you do this, you have to start from scratch.
2nd. I went to about:addons and I told Firefox not to automatically update add-ons.
3rd. I installed the first noscript version for Firefox Quantum from noscript repositories:
https://secure.informaction.com/download/releases/noscript-10.1.1.xpi
4th. I installed the rest of the add-ons I used to have before.
2.394 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Michael Rabinovsky, vor einem TagNo Script is an incredibly useful add-on. In the past, I'd have given it five stars; it now gets only two (see issues below). All in all, I'd say it's still better to have it than not, but that's only because there is no better alternative, and there is no difference between having to completely disable it on a page versus not having it at all.
First of all, it would have gotten three due to the issues I list further down, but it gets two because of a major functionality problem that makes it obnoxious to use, and by its admission, not private in private windows.
In the past, when you set it to trust top-level domains, it would automatically set them to temp trusted; however, for whatever reason, it now sets them to "custom," for me, which functions the same as untrusted, and changing it doesn't even refresh the page for you.
The default setting handling is a huge inconvenience, but that is not where the problems end. You cannot restore previous functionality by manually setting the top-level domain to temp trust. To enable scripts on the page, you must set it to trust, which makes it permanently trusted, and keeps a log of every page you visit in private windows. If you try to change it to temp trust and refresh the page, it goes back to "custom."
Besides that, the description for the extension is outdated. Not only does it still mention Flash, but it also claims no loss of functionality when you need it, which is not true. In most cases, enabling some scripts will return the functionality you need, but there are several reasons why that's not always the case.
Sometimes, certain scripts you need will be on sub-domains of the top-level domain, and they need to be enabled separately; however, NoScript doesn't show them because it thinks they are part of the main domain, so you have no way to make the site work without completely disabling the addon for the page.
In other instances, sites won't load all the scripts until they load some other domains. For example, a CDN containing vital scripts might not appear on the list because it's called after an analytics script has run. There is no way to know that unless you enable each script on the list, one by one. The domain doesn't need to be related; it's just something about how the page loads. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Angel, vor 4 TagenEsta vaina debería tener un modo automático para aquellos que no saben de programación.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon whatever, vor 4 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon HunterMirror, vor 7 TagenHe notado en las demás reseñas, que las personas no parecen comprender el propósito de este addon. La idea es que bloquee los scripts, si una página se rompe por ello, es algo perfectamente esperable, no es culpa de la extensión perse, sino de quien desarrolló dicha página web, queda a tu criterio si lo quieres añadir a la lista blanca o no. Lo realmente triste y reprochable, es más bien que hoy en día hayan tantas páginas que quieran que actives los scripts si o si para poder usarlos, incluso páginas que no los necesitan para nada.
El abuso de los scripts y la manía de convertir las páginas web en "aplicaciones", es lo que ha causado que ahora usar el navegador implique un consumo cada vez mayor de RAM, sin contar los riesgos de seguridad innecesarios del uso de scripts, tanto para el usuario como para el webmaster/desarrollador. Así que por mi parte, prefiero que se rompan las páginas que sean, no les voy a activar los scripts si no son páginas que hagan un uso inteligente y justo de ellas. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon k4mmi, vor 8 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19265671, vor 8 TagenIt give me the power to control every script on every sites.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18710229, vor 14 TagenThis add-on works as intended and has saved me from a lot of potential problems and annoying website antics.
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Air, vor einem MonatVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19157064, vor einem MonatCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Cory Sanin, vor einem MonatOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19145735, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon And?, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon A Tea Daze, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon srzlt, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon jordan9543, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon vit55555, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18218075, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon fiendkaka, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Shannon Sobeck, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19088604, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon kk, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19072892, vor 2 Monaten