Bewertungen für NoScript
NoScript von Giorgio Maone
Bewertungen von Firefox-Benutzer 13551624
Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternen
von Firefox-Benutzer 13551624, vor 8 JahrenIt is a real pitty that you do not seem to want to listen to the incredible ammount of people who are trying to tell you that you messed this up.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 Jahren"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2.415 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon 鼎针皮艺, vor einem Tag
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Bob, vor 8 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon mlatpren, vor 10 TagenIt does a great job at blocking, but is regularly frustrating with re-enabling things. It's supposed to show you what it's blocking, but that's extremely hit-or-miss. Occasionally, there'd be something blocked where the only solution is to disable the extension. As in, right-click and disable *from Firefox itself.*
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon zekromVale, vor 10 TagenThere needs to be a CPU limit on this extension, using 30% CPU of an intel i7 11th gen laptop CPU on YouTube is ridiculous. Firefox for Ubuntu snap, flatpack, or just .deb are affected. Must disable NoScript to fix it or allow everything fully for all domains on the page. I would like more domains to be added to the global trusted list though (by default) or have a popup at the top when you first visit a page.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Hopeavirta, vor 21 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Lazy Cat, vor 22 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon sumobunny, vor 23 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Zelgadis-San, vor 24 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Dadou, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon aq, vor einem MonatUser for at least 15 years, Something is conflicting on Firefox. It is blocking scripts and other add ons such as tampermonkey or violentmonkey with scripts added, but without any listing of what is being blocked. Only option is to shut it off to proceed.
Even blocking games internal scripts without any 'monkey' in use.
Please check and test - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Simon Bünemann, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon ADKFZ8O, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Marw, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon aedgsegsfvw, vor 2 MonatenWARNING! Causes crashes with SEVERE data loss. Since mid 2025, this extension regularly causes the browser to crash. It can even crash the browser so severely that windows freezes irreversibly, with SEVERE data loss as a result. The crashes stopped when I deleted this extension, and re-occurred after reinstalling it. Several others have reported the same issues on user forums.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 15990777, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Arman Daneshjoo, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon elmika, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19469020, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14500718, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19459487, vor 3 MonatenI'm notified every time WebGL is blocked on each page load. There's no way to disable these notifications and it's very irritating.
Edit: updated to 5 stars as it can be disabled after all but the setting isn't described very clearly.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 3 MonatenYou should not get any notification. Just a little placeholder inside the page, to be able to enable it back. And you can disable it by unchecking "NoScript Options>Appearance>Show synthetic placeholders for invisible capability probes" - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Cello, vor 3 Monatenit's 5-stars, because it's little time and effort to manage and also Edward Snowden said that noscript is the best protection in the whole internet...(after some Firefox update, noscript does seem to block internet in Firefox,,, but I'm sure there will be a workaround in the next edition ... buona vacanza)
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19223232, vor 3 Monatenok its a good security 4 ur browser but now the web is so slow that i cant even play a game on poki 💀💀
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Tony Klaus, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19311874, vor 3 Monaten