Bewertungen für Whitelist or Blacklist JavaScript
Whitelist or Blacklist JavaScript von veto
15 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Demosthene, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Krackenn, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16267510, vor 5 JahrenRemoves javascript, but doesn't activate
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14636734, vor 6 Jahrenbest one java extension I've tried on android os! great job.. tnx!
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14506485, vor 6 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14180998, vor 7 Jahrenfunciona justo para loque la necesito
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon JoaCHIP, vor 7 JahrenA simple and to-the-point way of cleaning up messy or rude websites with one click.
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Steve Coleman, vor 7 JahrenOverall I like this extension because of the controll it gives, but each open window/site needs to maintain its own state (enabled/disabled) and display the icon for that specific state. Right now, changing the state of any one open window changes the icon on every other window such that its state and displayed icon are then out of sync. Changing the state of any open window means you can no longer trust the other windows displayed icon to be telling you the truth. I can't tell you how many times I have tried to reactivate javascript for a window that was already enabled, and only to find that I had to change it back again, thus changing all the icons on the other open windows.
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Fred Thompson, vor 7 JahrenWorks great...until it doesn't.
From what I can tell, whitelist failures are when a site is referenced which is not in the list. Makes sense but whitelisting should be applied to a tab, based on the page url. Alternately, there should be 2 types of whitelist; strict and tab. In that case, a yellow checkmark could indicate partial (strict) blocking and the green icon could indicate full whitelist.
Here are examples of sites which don't work properly:
wetransfer.com
wireshark.org
addons.mozilla.org
https://whitelistjavascript.com - yes, the home page of this extension!Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 7 Jahrenthanks for the reply and your testing.
i will apply this 2 types of whitelist; strict and tab.
on strict only resouces in the whitelist will be allowed
and on tab, all resources loaded under this tab url will be allowed. - Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13580909, vor 7 Jahrenthe storefunction does not work properly on my firefox. I have allways to click again to websides, that I made it before
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12777693, vor 7 JahrenThis is a good addon, but due to some bug it constantly blocks Google's services like gmail and google keep, although the plugin runs in blacklist mode and google is definitly not there.
It happens after each browser restartAntwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 7 Jahrenthanks for the review. i will try to fix it on this coming weekend - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13510507, vor 7 JahrenWould recommend.
1. It works.
2. I wish there were an option to remove the logo from the URL bar: it serves zero purpose. (If the developer could make another addon that moved the refresh button to the URL bar, that would get a 5 from me.)
3. The other icon (the green tick) is a really bad icon: A green tick could be used for just about any addon and it would vaguely make sense, which is precisely the problem. A green tick doesn't distinguish it at all. I switched to this addon after YesScript stopped working after the Addon apocalypse. That has great icons: a white scroll, which you'll be familiar with if you use Windows, that turns black once you blacklist a site.
4. I wish there were an option to disable auto-refresh. If that's too hard, disable the refresh. I can refresh a page myself.
5. Weird behavior within the addon's options when using drop-down box for changing to blacklist, but that doesn't matter really. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13405391, vor 7 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon hansgruber, vor 8 JahrenProduct appears to get in my way for web sites that *should* work. So far, have had to disable the add-on much more than running it as enabled. Will test more; but, for now, causes too many headaches.