Bewertungen für WOT - Sicher surfen
WOT - Sicher surfen von WOT Services
610 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Carter, vor einem JahrThis extension has been exposed for selling user data. Also their website is crumbling to dust.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrHey Carter, please contact us directly so we can look into it. - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon User, vor einem JahrAs soon as there will be more transparent and honest alternative, people will stop using WOT, but for now they are essential service. They had a tradition of rarely selling ratings to scam sites and selling personal data, but still to check balance of good deeds vs harm they are noticeably on good side. But only until transparent alternative emerges (or they dramatically improve transparency and trustworthiness and protection against fake ratings of any kind).
And for sure have a compassion - area they work is extremly hard and full of people who want to exploit. Even Google is failing lately in a holy battle against spam.
And fix my badge please, just got 1500+ points, and still no recognition! Outrageous! :)Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrHi there, if you are enjoying WOT, please give it a 5-star rating to support our efforts 🙂 - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Lover, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon dE_logics, vor einem JahrThis steals and sells your data
https://thehackernews.com/2016/11/web-of-trust-addon.htmlAntwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13507298, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon 77553322AHST.Add-ons Firefox Android, vor einem Jahrhttps://mywot.com/temir5.org
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Mikis, vor einem Jahr
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrHey Rambo Woo, we are glad you are trying out our app :)- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Alex, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon zluka505, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon MaSHiNiK, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon James Barcus, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Laconia, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13361995, vor 2 JahrenЧто случилось с дополнением - оно жрёт память и проц как не в себя. Ну и плюс оценки на некоторых сайтах просто бесполезный кусок шлакоблоков. Раньше нравилось, а сейчас невозможно пользоваться - браузер еле ворочается с ним.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon kriztmark hacking session, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18068857, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18040293, vor 2 JahrenA long time ago was great. Now it puts shady ads on all the websites. Eff you, WOT. I would literally pay a subscription much faster than deal with ads.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Coiialj, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Philip Goddard, vor 2 Jahren(updated 6 September 2023) On the face of it, WOT is a great idea, but it wrongly gives some completely safe, authentic and trustworthy sites a poor safety rating -- two of my own sites suffering thus at the moment. For this sort of thing it's necessary for the site owner to be able to contact WOT admin directly, and not go through the cumbersome, lengthy, and indeed unreliable business of posting in the Forum to get members to review the affected site(s), or/and jump through other hoops -- but as far as I can make out, there are no such means.
Also, crowd-sourced ratings are worse than useless for giving a proper impression of validity, authenticity and overall quality of a site's contents, with regard to any subject matter about which most people hold beliefs -- such as religion, spirituality, New-Age and related areas, and indeed so-called 'mental health' (which is based in the materialistic reductionism belief system). In all such cases, the majority, belief-driven view takes priority over the more rational, objective (observation-based) view, and what the ratings are indicating is NOT any quality of the respective site contents, but simply their popularity -- which at best isn't particularly useful, and generally is seriously misleading.
One of my own sites is impacted thus, and it's galling to see so many belief-based sites (intrinsically misinformational because belief stands in the way of seeing what's really there) getting high ratings just because the respective beliefs are popular or traditional, while my own pioneering belief-free, objectively based site has only a so-so rating despite a string of very positive reviews from people who've genuinely benefited from that site.
Extrapolating from how my own sites are being treated by WOT, it's very reasonable always to be very circumspect about WOT ratings.
**Update, 6 August 2023**
I responded to the so-called Developer response to this review, with a detailed and constructive rundown on the various problems about WOT and asking for my wrongly 'usafe' and 'suspicious' rated sites to have their ratings corrected.
These people are mindbogglinly complacent and self-serving. All I got back was their standard BS line, with clear indications that this was just a pasted standard message, and one has to conclude that the contents of my message went unread.
I've therefore decreased my rating to one star.
I've tried to give WOT reasonable benefit of doubt, but they show themselves to be right out of touch with any sense of genuine human responsibility for what they're doing. Sure, it's a service, but the question is, who it's really serving. Not decent and conscientious websites and their owners, that's for sure! -- The WOT people should be hanging their heads in shame! - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18002481, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18002124, vor 2 Jahrenrecently a few relible and well know websites got red and orange colour for no reason. Tried to contact WOT but got two times same copy / pasted response.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenHey there, we would love it if you can share the names of the sites that we flagged, and we will carefully examen them..support@mywot.com - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Matthew Conrad, vor 2 JahrenUsed to be a good sites reputation extension. Now filled with ads and "premium" feature. Too bad! It used to be good and simple!
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon pelle, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17847732, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17832293, vor 2 JahrenMillionen von Nutzerdaten verkauft. Ich wundere mich, wieso dieses Addon überhaupt noch auf dem Browser Addon Markt exestiert! Schmutz, einfach weg damit!
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenHallo, bitte kontaktieren Sie uns direkt, damit wir uns das Problem ansehen können.