Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
Response by Giorgio Maone
Developer response
posted 8 years ago"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2,388 reviews
- Rated 3 out of 5by Air, 12 days agoVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 19157064, 19 days agoCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Cory Sanin, 19 days agoOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19145735, 21 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by And?, 25 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by A Tea Daze, 25 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by srzlt, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by jordan9543, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by vit55555, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18218075, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by fiendkaka, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Shannon Sobeck, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19088604, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by kk, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19072892, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by cwqing1973, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14468519, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by rabbitshee, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19047433, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by A. Bilmanda, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lazer Bear, 2 months ago