Reviews for FoxyProxy Standard
FoxyProxy Standard by Eric Jung, erosman
Review by dico_TP
Rated 5 out of 5
by dico_TP, 4 years agoPerfect for my tests with cloud VM in other countries.
There's one thing I whished for: If called site matches whitelist, it would be great if all followed includes from that page to other servers (tracking, cdn) would be proxied as well. Apart from that, nice tool.
There's one thing I whished for: If called site matches whitelist, it would be great if all followed includes from that page to other servers (tracking, cdn) would be proxied as well. Apart from that, nice tool.
966 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by ky, 4 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19084096, 21 days ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by jacq, 25 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alex Alex, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Cherk, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by aas, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19017224, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19004191, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Negardiaa, 2 months ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by ahmed, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Animetico, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Bartosz Kaźmierczak, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by hotpoint, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18943098, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18910117, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13406594, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by nahiyan, 3 months ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by sweet, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Brutto WP, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 12242725, 4 months agoWhat's the point of having Shadowsocks support if you don’t allow any settings? Am I missing something?!
Developer response
posted 4 months agoThe server list is an auto-fill helper to fill type, hostname and port. Extensions do not have direct access to other applications running on users computer. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18889269, 4 months ago