Reviews for Web of Trust, MyWOT/WOT: Website Reputation Rating
Web of Trust, MyWOT/WOT: Website Reputation Rating by WOT Services
150 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Carter, a year agoThis extension has been exposed for selling user data. Also their website is crumbling to dust.
- Rated 1 out of 5by dE_logics, a year agoThis steals and sells your data
https://thehackernews.com/2016/11/web-of-trust-addon.htmlDeveloper response
posted a year agoHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13507298, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by MaSHiNiK, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Laconia, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13361995, 2 years agoЧто случилось с дополнением - оно жрёт память и проц как не в себя. Ну и плюс оценки на некоторых сайтах просто бесполезный кусок шлакоблоков. Раньше нравилось, а сейчас невозможно пользоваться - браузер еле ворочается с ним.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18068857, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18040293, 2 years agoA long time ago was great. Now it puts shady ads on all the websites. Eff you, WOT. I would literally pay a subscription much faster than deal with ads.
Developer response
posted 2 years agoHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Rated 1 out of 5by Coiialj, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Philip Goddard, 2 years ago(updated 6 September 2023) On the face of it, WOT is a great idea, but it wrongly gives some completely safe, authentic and trustworthy sites a poor safety rating -- two of my own sites suffering thus at the moment. For this sort of thing it's necessary for the site owner to be able to contact WOT admin directly, and not go through the cumbersome, lengthy, and indeed unreliable business of posting in the Forum to get members to review the affected site(s), or/and jump through other hoops -- but as far as I can make out, there are no such means.
Also, crowd-sourced ratings are worse than useless for giving a proper impression of validity, authenticity and overall quality of a site's contents, with regard to any subject matter about which most people hold beliefs -- such as religion, spirituality, New-Age and related areas, and indeed so-called 'mental health' (which is based in the materialistic reductionism belief system). In all such cases, the majority, belief-driven view takes priority over the more rational, objective (observation-based) view, and what the ratings are indicating is NOT any quality of the respective site contents, but simply their popularity -- which at best isn't particularly useful, and generally is seriously misleading.
One of my own sites is impacted thus, and it's galling to see so many belief-based sites (intrinsically misinformational because belief stands in the way of seeing what's really there) getting high ratings just because the respective beliefs are popular or traditional, while my own pioneering belief-free, objectively based site has only a so-so rating despite a string of very positive reviews from people who've genuinely benefited from that site.
Extrapolating from how my own sites are being treated by WOT, it's very reasonable always to be very circumspect about WOT ratings.
**Update, 6 August 2023**
I responded to the so-called Developer response to this review, with a detailed and constructive rundown on the various problems about WOT and asking for my wrongly 'usafe' and 'suspicious' rated sites to have their ratings corrected.
These people are mindbogglinly complacent and self-serving. All I got back was their standard BS line, with clear indications that this was just a pasted standard message, and one has to conclude that the contents of my message went unread.
I've therefore decreased my rating to one star.
I've tried to give WOT reasonable benefit of doubt, but they show themselves to be right out of touch with any sense of genuine human responsibility for what they're doing. Sure, it's a service, but the question is, who it's really serving. Not decent and conscientious websites and their owners, that's for sure! -- The WOT people should be hanging their heads in shame! - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18002124, 2 years agorecently a few relible and well know websites got red and orange colour for no reason. Tried to contact WOT but got two times same copy / pasted response.
Developer response
posted 2 years agoHey there, we would love it if you can share the names of the sites that we flagged, and we will carefully examen them..support@mywot.com - Rated 1 out of 5by Matthew Conrad, 2 years agoUsed to be a good sites reputation extension. Now filled with ads and "premium" feature. Too bad! It used to be good and simple!
Developer response
posted 2 years agoHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Rated 1 out of 5by pelle, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17832293, 2 years agoMillionen von Nutzerdaten verkauft. Ich wundere mich, wieso dieses Addon überhaupt noch auf dem Browser Addon Markt exestiert! Schmutz, einfach weg damit!
Developer response
posted 2 years agoHallo, bitte kontaktieren Sie uns direkt, damit wir uns das Problem ansehen können. - Rated 1 out of 5by kaiete, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by einwolfsregen, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pavel, 2 years agonot working((
When I try to use this extension, I see:
300: jar:file:///Users/pavel/Library/Application%20Support/Firefox/Profiles/gnzh2o7v.default-release/extensions/%7Ba0d7ccb3-214d-498b-b4aa-0e8fda9a7bf7%7D.xpi!/
200: filename content-length last-modified file-type
201: META-INF/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: _locales/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: addReview.html 2781 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: breachInfo.html 1655 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: error.html 842 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: images/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: libs/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: loggedOut.html 2545 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: manifest.json 6298 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: offering.html 1439 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: options.html 2687 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: popup.html 1476 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: presettings.html 2288 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: resources/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: scripts/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: slider.html 5906 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: styles/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: systempage.html 933 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILEDeveloper response
posted 2 years agoHi Pavel, we are sorry to hear about your experience with WOT. Please contact us directly so we can assist you with any issue- support@mywot.com - Rated 1 out of 5by serezha, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15658891, 3 years agoRubbish. Filled with ignorant reviews from people who don't understand how the internet works and can't change how your profile name appears so you doxx yourself really easily.
Developer response
posted 3 years agoHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can understand why you feel this way and how the extension can be improved for you 🙂 - Rated 1 out of 5by Lucider, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15151704, 3 years agoHard to believe they're still around. No one else has ripped off their users as much as they have.
Developer response
posted 3 years agoHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the extension can be improved for you and understand why you feel this way. - Rated 1 out of 5by WayTooBad, 3 years agoThis add-on tags conservative sites as untrustworthy no matter what ratings they got. It blocks them each time you try to visit even after reporting the site as safe. Meanwhile obvious scam sites are not blocked.
Developer response
posted 3 years agoHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Rated 1 out of 5by xsSplater, 3 years agoПостоянные всплывающие окошки: "КУПИ НАШУ ПРОГРАММУ!", "НУ, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА! КУПИИИ!", "ТЕБЯ ОСТЛЕЖИВАЮТ! КУПИ!", "БЕЗ НАШЕЙ ПРОГИ ТЕБЕ ХАНА! КУПИ!"...
Спасибо, конечно, за ценное расширение, но теперь с ним хуже, чем без него. К тому же, у нас в Беларуси НЕЛЬЗЯ НИЧЕГО КУПИТЬ сейчас. Опять же тормоза и задержки жуткие с этим расширением везде.
Всего доброго!Developer response
posted 3 years agoHey there, we are sad to hear about this situation.
Please contact us directly if you have any questions or if there's anything we can assist you with 🙂 - Rated 1 out of 5by Naitlydragon, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15503330, 3 years agoIt's a tracker. That didn't bother me much, but lately it's after your passwords. Now it's malware.
Developer response
posted 3 years agoHey there, Wot's purpose is to keep you safe while you browse online.
We invite you to contact us directly if have any questions, thanks.