911 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Kevin, a year agoUTM parameters are used so companies can see if their spend led to a sale. They have no way to track individuals in the slightest and should not be removed
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17574432, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by acmor, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Gabb4SauRuzZ, a year ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by iwatchedmybuddydieinafghanistan, a year agogood enough default exceptions list but unfortunately filters out and breaks amazon search filters. it also breaks google trends searches. even more unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a newbie friendly way to add new exceptions. it's possible, sure, but should the average person have to learn regex to accomplish it? i would appreciate site-wide whitelists at least, that way i don't forget to re-enable it once i'm done on a site it breaks.
- Rated 5 out of 5by frapox, a year agovery useful extension to remove tracking from URLs. If you encounter any problem with sites that don't like adblocker, just turn off "Allow domain blocking" from the extention's options.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16970122, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by DDjivan, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ido, a year ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Birdkc, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ThatGuyJacobee, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by andy, a year ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 17970086, a year agoImport Actually Legitimate URL Shortener Tool + activate Adguard Url tracking protection and there doesn't seem to be a real need for this anymore.
- Rated 2 out of 5by ThanxBiotch, a year agoHasn't even tried to fix the sorting problem if used while shopping. Position of ignoring request or criticism disregards the apps' intent. Is this because the data collected is sold to them? Wouldn't that be the instance when "cleaning" would be most useful?
- Rated 5 out of 5by GAURANG PANCHAL, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by THX1138, a year agoArbeitet viel besser als andere AddOn's die angeblich genauso arbeiten. (z.B. Link Cleaner)
Nach über vier Jahren immer noch eine TOP-Erweiterung! - Rated 5 out of 5by Laura, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Анна, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by King, a year ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by squadbombs, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Cybrosys, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13908620, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by CCN0, a year ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by cheatfreak47, a year agoClearURLs is an extension I've used for about a year, but I've recently disabled for the time being.
On the surface, ClearURLs is an excellent extension and it provides all the things it claims to, and it works, exactly as described.
The problem really comes from when it doesn't work- and how annoying it is to deal with in those situations.
ClearURLs lacks what I would call an extremely essential feature for an extension like this. A Whitelist. When ClearURLs breaks something, your only option(s) are to report it to the developer, and disable it until you are past whatever thing it broke, and then turn it back on.
This is tremendously annoying. To make matters worse, from what I can tell- the development of this extension has been relatively stale in the last few years. I'm sure the developer has plenty of good reasons why they haven't been working on it too much, but that doesn't change the reality of the situation.
Whitelisting has been an issue on their issue tracker for over 4 years. There's been an open merge request that added the feature for at least a year which hasn't been merged, and in that time, there's only been a handful of commits, usually just what I consider "maintenance mode" sorts of pushes. Stuff like "oh firefox changed a thing, I'll just remove this little bit here then" stuff.
On top of that, it's clear that the issue tracker is full of reports, many of which are clear duplicates and it really isn't being maintained all that well. Obviously developing extensions takes time and effort, like any software so I won't really hold that against them, but still- it seems a little scatterbrained to me.
Regardless, ClearURLs is fine for what it is, I just think a few small feature upgrades would take it from being just pretty good sometimes to truly being excellent, and arguably an essential online privacy extension. It just currently annoys me too much to use it regularly.