Reviews for Dark Reader
Dark Reader by Dark Reader Ltd
177 reviews
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14989693, 6 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14792796, 6 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14661604, 6 years agoIt slows down webpages as well as the browser. I am going to uninstall it. This extension needs a lot of improvement.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14636167, 6 years agoNOW USELESS ........
unfortunately, besides the fact that it really slows down all browser pages loading as mentioned by many users ....an even WORSE issue (which the developer refuses to respond to as i have messaged him directly over the past 2 months) is the FACT that one can no longer even SEE THE Scroll-bar on any given page ...it is so faint as to be virtually invisible (i actually had to use a magnifying glass to find the scroll-bar or scroll-button on every browser page) ...rendering Dark Reader Impractical and frankly USELESS. i have now switched over to Midnight Lizard, which has much better control and NO scroll-bar issues, can see the scroll-bar & scroll buttons perfectly using Midnight Lizard. - Rated 2 out of 5by humpty, 6 years agoSlows down the page loading. A lot.
(about 4 or 5 times slower than other formatters). It's amazing how it is able to attract so many users. - Rated 2 out of 5by Username 1º287346532, 6 years agoSlows down sites to the point of being unusable. No read the manual section. Counterintuitive settings.
- Rated 2 out of 5by <gmfady>®, 6 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by 2-bits, 6 years agoThere are a lot of little bugs. Sometimes, I have to switch the extension off and on before it loads a side. Sometimes, when I add a site to my exceptions list it renders it as "dark" anyway. A lot of major sites (such as google.com) have parts of UI become invisible with this plug-in active (at least in dark mode). Kinda neat, but not up to the Chrome version yet.
Dark Mode - an extension I've been trying in this one's stead has a much smaller feature set but works far more reliably. - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14580429, 6 years agoIt really slowed down my browsing experience. It was so slow I had to uninstall. Looks like it works really well and has a lot of options. But this doesn't matter if it's too slow to use
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 12328754, 6 years agoGreat idea but it makes pages slow. Needs to be addressed.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14574573, 6 years agoI want to like this add-on. I really do. I love everything else about it except it causes excessive loading times.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13319396, 6 years agoIt's good on Chrome, but a disaster on Firefox. It integrates great with Facebook on Chrome, it's awful with FB on Firefox. Fix it before you release it. Cheers!
- Rated 2 out of 5by Xavier Novella Sinde, 6 years agoGood idea and i liked it. Mobil version seem better than Laptop version.
It slows the hell out of the PC! :S - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14453400, 6 years agoFirefox becomes unusable as I only have 4 GB of RAM and it keeps freezing and is otherwise slow with this. Manjaro Linux OS. When disabling Firefox is normal again.
```bash
[jray@jr-dl ~]$ inxi -Fxz
System: Host: jr-dl Kernel: 4.19.2-1-MANJARO x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 8.2.1 Desktop: N/A Distro: Manjaro Linux
Machine: Type: Laptop System: Dell product: Latitude E6410 v: 0001 serial:
Mobo: Dell model: 0HNGW4 serial: UEFI: Dell v: A16 date: 12/05/2013
Battery: ID-1: BAT0 charge: 37.2 Wh condition: 37.2/48.8 Wh (76%) model: Samsung SDI DELL PT43699 status: Full
CPU: Topology: Dual Core model: Intel Core i5 M 560 bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Nehalem rev: 5 L2 cache: 3072 KiB
flags: lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx bogomips: 21290
Speed: 1197 MHz min/max: 1199/2667 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1325 2: 1200 3: 1320 4: 1442
Graphics: Device-1: Intel Core Processor Integrated Graphics vendor: Dell Latitude E6410 driver: i915 v: kernel
bus ID: 00:02.0
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.3 driver: intel unloaded: modesetting resolution: 1440x900~60Hz, 1920x1080~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ironlake Mobile v: 2.1 Mesa 18.2.5 direct render: Yes
Audio: Device-1: Intel 5 Series/3400 Series High Definition Audio vendor: Dell Latitude E6410 driver: snd_hda_intel
v: kernel bus ID: 00:1b.0
Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.19.2-1-MANJARO
Network: Device-1: Intel 82577LM Gigabit Network vendor: Dell Latitude E6410 driver: e1000e v: 3.2.6-k port: 7040
bus ID: 00:19.0
IF: eno1 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac:
Device-2: Broadcom Limited BCM43224 802.11a/b/g/n vendor: Dell Wireless 1520 Half-size Mini PCIe Card driver: wl
v: kernel port: 7000 bus ID: 02:00.0
IF: wlp2s0 state: down mac:
Drives: Local Storage: total: 1.20 TiB used: 67.28 GiB (5.5%)
ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Seagate model: ST9320423AS size: 298.09 GiB
ID-2: /dev/sdb type: USB vendor: Seagate model: Expansion size: 931.51 GiB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 284.06 GiB used: 19.33 GiB (6.8%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
ID-2: swap-1 size: 8.18 GiB used: 1.67 GiB (20.4%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda3
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 49.0 C mobo: N/A sodimm: 43.0 C
Fan Speeds (RPM): cpu: 2901
Info: Processes: 202 Uptime: 7h 22m Memory: 3.72 GiB used: 2.22 GiB (59.9%) Init: systemd Compilers: gcc: 8.2.1
Shell: bash v: 4.4.23 inxi: 3.0.27
``` - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14332609, 6 years agoI must say this is by far the best looking extension I have ever used; but the performance is horrific, when loading specific websites it grinds your PC to a halt, and my computer is not a low spec machine.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14347298, 6 years agoi want to love it but it makes everything unbearably slow
- Rated 2 out of 5by Kevin, 6 years agoInterferes with Firefox browser, not enough customization for prime time for me, and as everyone else mentioned, it slows performance.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14124570, 6 years agoBeen using this for a while now, while it is one of the few that actually works, it slows down browsing by a LOT. PLEASE PLEASE fix this
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14302957, 6 years agoThe Firefox version makes using this thing so annoying. It's great under Chrome but for some reason it slows down load times so much it's impossible to use with Firefox.
I mean, it's a great idea and when it works it works well, but if I wanted to wait 5 seconds for each page to load I'd stop paying for my high speed cable connection. I gave up on Chrome after the latest update and wanted to move all my plugins over to Firefox. The is the only one that caused enough hassle that I had to give it up. Too bad I got so used to it under Chrome. - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14275936, 7 years agoAwesome add-on but the Firefox version slows down a lot the browser. The Chrome version is perfect (but the browser isn't)
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14228989, 7 years agoEs una muybuena extension, pero la eficacia de navegacion se ve reducida.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14116941, 7 years agothis is so close to being perfect.
websites look great but some are running slower and giving errors. i'll check back in a month or two to see if it has been updated! - Rated 2 out of 5by VittoIB, 7 years agoPages load extremely slow after installing this extension. Besides an ad blocker, I have no other extensions installed and I found that some pages wouldn't even load without a "stop script" pop-up.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13953226, 7 years agoI used to love it, but now its constantly breaking webpages. Things won't appear when they're right in front of you if you turn it off, images only load halfway, can't interact with some content on screen while Dark Reader is on...
I'm using Radeon Adrenaline drivers on Ryzen 2200g APU.