Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
51 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by parallax77, 17 days agounreliable these days since a lot of people are getting marked red despite being very trans-positive or even previously marked green, and a lot of random people suddenly turning green despite not meeting any requirements. moderation should step up imo.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17022614, 18 days agoat one point it seemed decently reliable, but i just saw the entire wikipedia dot org article for okra - yes the plant/food - flagged as transphobic so i uhhh. i have very VERY serious doubts about how well moderated (if at all) the submissions are anymore
- Rated 1 out of 5by ol, 19 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by crgzero, a month agoNot accurate and relies on feelings instead of facts, what one person thinks is fine another will freak out over. Reviews can't be fact based on something that doesn't rely on facts.
- Rated 1 out of 5by AJ167, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by anettka, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Scoobysnak, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15176908, 7 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18066063, 7 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by MirioMan, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by herr, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by bleh, 10 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18026876, 10 months agoit is hardly ever accurate and mainly boils down to things the creators just disagree with
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17366374, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17823267, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Bong13, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Virtuality, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17175745, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16747176, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by OSDevon, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16137377, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17228589, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by subVoid, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by ToxicMushroom, 3 years ago