Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
674 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by kingofthelosers, 8 months agoso incredibly intersexist and has gone really downhill. terrible extension if you're a trans man/masc or intersex, would not recommend
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18701492, 8 months agotheyfab and transtrender are terms that originated on 4chan to refer to nonbinary people and transgender men in a derogatory way. they are without any doubt transphobic terms. yet shinigami eyes devs seem to disagree. the voices of transphobes on 4chan matter more than trans men and nb and intersex people to them. dont trust anyone willing to throw other trans people under the bus, theyre more of a danger than anyone shinigami eyes would mark as red. useless addon now.
stay strong brothers. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18710765, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Googly, 8 months agoI once thought this extension was a small, but helpful tool to help me avoid transphobes and threats.
Now, I wonder how many intersex voices I've drowned out, knowing now that the developers of the extension are staunchly against our intersex allies. - Rated 1 out of 5by fhngoisdfjgoidsf, 8 months agoPeople who ARE Transgender are getting flagged as not safe! This add-on is grouping transgender people with transphobes all over identity label discourse, it's sad that one of the only tools to help our community is going to die on a hill that most people (unless they're chronically online) don't know or care about! It's doing more harm than good when random trans women and trans men get labeled as anti-LGBTQ over something that's basically nothing.
Now if someone is marked red, I get a 50/50 chance that they're either a transgender person with a debated over identity or someone that wants to kill LGBT people for just existing! - Rated 1 out of 5by cassettetape, 8 months agoUsed to be helpful. Now it's the opposite. I've seen many trans-friendly accounts marked as transphobic and vice versa. Looking at other people's experiences, this seems to be a result of various harmful attempts to divide our community. In the years since installing this add-on, I slowly realized how unreliable it was. I've learned how to examine accounts/websites to determine for myself if they are truly transphobic, and I encourage others to do the same. This add-on is less than worthless to me now - it's actively misinforming me. I will be uninstalling it.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Whoopsie Collective, 8 months agoGreat in concept, but recently has been really inaccurate.
Quite a few people I follow that are trans advocates have been marked red recently for no apparent reason, and I've seen absolutely vile transphobia from accounts marked green. - Rated 1 out of 5by sanguinemoon, 8 months agogood in theory. however, people who are/advocating for intersex people are being flagged as transphobic by staff, as well as people who believe in discrimination against transgender men. anyone who doesn't fit a very narrow subset of transness or support for transness is marked as a transphobe. this seems to be a tool only for not even trans girls but a very specific subset of them.
i really really believe this tool can be great as long as we get over our personal biases and stop being assholes. splitting others who are hurt from us only harms the whole group. discrimination only helps those who wish to see not just trans people but everyone who is lgbtq+ destroyed.
as a trans girl myself, it's stupid that we even have to talk about this.
only by being together can we survive. don't be stupid and discriminate. - Rated 1 out of 5by wallie, 8 months agoTrans friendly accounts are being marked red for being intersex advocates. Transphobes are being marked green. Will not be using this extension again unless this issue is fixed.
- Rated 1 out of 5by artisticunderdog12, 8 months agoNeeds serious moderation.
I've been routinely seeing folks who espouse transphobic, exorsexist, and intersexist stuff be marked as trans-friendly solely because they themselves are trans, meanwhile, intersex activists and trans POC are marked as transphobic??
99% of the markings also feel solely fueled by whether or not one personally dislikes the person they're marking. I think this could be improved with a requirement to add *why* someone is being marked red or green, but right now, the extension is useless and only being used for infighting. - Rated 1 out of 5by Junowo, 8 months agoIncredibly disheartening to see that this extension is being used as a bludgeoning tool against trans men and intersex people. Even if this was solely a small online discourse it is wildly inappropriate to be marking trans activists as transphobic because you disagree on their nuance on what type of transphobia is "valid".
- Rated 1 out of 5by shannoncm4, 8 months agoThis used to be a useful extension but now the devs have begun to mark trans men, nonbinary people, and intersex people who discuss their issues and rights as red. I've also heard instances of trans/nonbinary POC who've called out racism within the queer community being flagged as well. Very disappointing to see an extension that once offered some safety start aiding transphobia, exorsexism, intersexism, and racism.
- Rated 1 out of 5by venusbunny, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18708457, 8 months agoim very disappointed that this extension started marking intersex people and people who show support for them as red.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18703965, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by youdon'tcareaboutmeandIknowit, 8 months agoThis extension isn't queer safe anymore, it toxic discourse now. Queer cannot be dicated through cis ideals, and we don't exist to conform to them. But being Intersex and Agender I expect this behavior this app has extended. A safe place for hateful trans people and undercover terfs.
- Rated 1 out of 5by m Siaw, 8 months agoPoor moderation with no transparency. Many intersex and transmasculine people of color are labeled red for talking about intersex human rights, culturally-specific gender experiences, and personal trans experiences that don't center or pedestal transfeminine experiences. Many people who habitually pedojacket, harass, crusade against, and rumormonger ("socially murder") about these same intersex and transmasc BIPOC (specifically using transphobic tactics and rhetoric) are marked green. It's difficult to take in good faith, defeating the purpose of the extension.
Intersex people using intersex-coined, intersex-focused labels and talking about intersex human rights is not a form of transmisogyny. People of color talking about our personal experiences with gender and how they vary with our native cultures is not "aligning our goal[s] with [those] of TERFs," and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the contradiction there with how overtly and frequently racist TERFs are. Asserting that marginalized people talking about our personal experiences is a form of bigotry actively hampers trans liberation. You cannot take transmisogyny seriously if you're putting transfems on pedestals (which is bad in general because transfems are a kind of human, not some special exception) at the expense of other vulnerable community members. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17992858, 8 months agoRecently started marking anyone who is advocating for intersex rights/awareness as well as trans men's as red.
Additionally devs are specifically targeting queer people of color who are calling out white trans people (specifically white trans woman) for racism and intersex people who are calling out the interphobia that's in the queer community.
Hit dogs hollar - Rated 1 out of 5by nepsah, 8 months agoI used to rely on this quite a bit, but I'm finding more and more that users are being incorrectly flagged as transphobic when they shouldn't be. This was a nice idea in theory, but its clear that either the devs aren't actually reading through what gets flagged, or they hold some pretty egregious exclusionary beliefs.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Emily Thomsit, 8 months agoAs a trans woman this is not useful anymore, an account having a red name doesn't necessarily mean they actually are transphobic, and it seems that the extension is being used to target intersex and trans-masc people
- Rated 1 out of 5by Basil, 8 months agoDo not use this extension. The devs manually flag people who acknowledge the issues trans men and intersex people have to face as red. absolutely disgusting.
someone i followed on tumblr was marked as red for committing the crime of.. believing trans men and intersex people should have their terms respected.
several trans people of colour are also marked as red for calling out white trans people as racist.
edit: after seeing the devs spamming the same response. yeah. fuck this extension. The devs are telling intersex people not to use the terms their own community made. If an intersex transwoman says shes afab, she isnt forcing an amab transwoman to identify herself as male. disgusting.
Stop throwing nonbinary, transmasc, and intersex people under the bus, and maybe you'll stop having so many people angry with you. - Rated 1 out of 5by Hal, 8 months agoIt used to be good. Now it's bad. Plenty of red marks are just black trans people calling out bullshit.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Rohebat, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Aiden-Nevada, 8 months agoThis add-on would be great if it didn't mark discussions of transadnrophobia and enbyphobia/exorsexism as transphobic. It also should ideally include intersex people and not mark intersex inclusive spaces, discussions of intersex issues and intersexism as transphobic. Intersex people can not only be trans too, they also fight for bodily autonomy and their bodies being able to exist without confroming to outdated gender roles. And multigender people or people with seemingly contradictory identities (like transmasc lesbians) should be included in the extention too and not marked as transphobic.
Aside from that it's a great extention that helps me filter our transphobia that could be trigerring for me.
So keep up the good work, but please look into above issues once you have time!