Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
1,002 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18737026, 4 months agoThe creator of Shinigami Eyes, Laurelai Bailey, is a rapist. pastebin.com/GyzaNTSP medium.com/@astoracat/anatomy-of-a-rape-survivor-708e5c49c645 www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/s/EJraeU2aLY
- Rated 1 out of 5by Beensjamin, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18736928, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by PhoenixPinks, 4 months agoIt used to be very useful but it's gone way downhill. Transman and intersex people have been marked red, completely untrustworthy now.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ashen Raven, 4 months agoAbsolute mess as of late, and incredibly disappointing. Do NOT use this tool; it's unreliable at best, and at worst, actively dangerous.
Trans men, intersex people and nonbinary folks existing isn't transphobic, nor are the people supporting them and discussing the problems and discrimination these people face. Feminism-appropriating transphobes are. Stop marking the former as anti-trans and the latter pro-trans when we all know neither is true. - Rated 1 out of 5by plasma, 4 months agoShinigami Eyes has been useful in the past, but in the last year or so has really shit the bed. Started with actively transphobic individuals being marked as green, trans friendly people that simply talked about a trans person's bad behaviour being marked red, & then quickly started marking actual trans & intersex people as red, especially when they're masculine.
Being a man is not transphobic. Trans men talking about their unique oppression is not transphobic. Being intersex is not transphobic. Being nonbinary is not transphobic. Acknowledging a trans individual's harmful actions is not transphobic.
Why the trans community is suddenly adopting transphobic beliefs is beyond me & I'm incredibly disappointed. If you genuinely believe perisex trans women are the only people allowed to talk about trans issues you need to dig deep & consider why. Do you actually want equality, or do you just want a turn at being on top? - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18114952, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Centipiddle, 4 months agoMany users have mentioned there is a bias against transmasculine and intersex individuals and marking them anti-trans, which is true. But I'd like to also add that I've seen literal trans exclusionary radical feminists marked green, and trans women marked as red.
In concept I appreciated what this addon was going for, but past using it for news sources (which with recent events I find it hard to trust anymore) it's useless. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18736635, 4 months agoUsed to be a very helpful extension for identifying TERFs, but personal biases have made this extension unreliable for its intended purpose.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17281943, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18736618, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Avakining, 4 months agoUsed to be very helpful for trans folk like myself. Unfortunately, some combination of the person running it, the human moderators who (allegedly) vet reports, and user reports have recently resulted in flagging trans men and intersex people (and anyone who supports those fine folk) as transphobic.
This obviously goes against the purpose of this extension and is overall dangerous. It's a shame, but I can't see myself using this extension anymore. - Rated 1 out of 5by Boomalope Pope, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by CorenDera, 4 months agoInaccurate description - Transmen and Intersex individuals are tagged as transphobic often. As well as anyone who is supportive of transmen and intersex people. Do not use without being ready to research EVERY color change.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Arkantolas, 4 months agoYou claim to stand for trans people and yet you peddle the very lies and hatred towards transmasc/intersex people that others hurl at us. You are a traitor to your own people. You have shown me that there is no LGBT community- only communities of people who are LGBT. The hatred and lies you spew are disgusting and dangerous. You are using this as add on as a tool to spread your vitriol and I will not stand for that.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Sol, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by eternalroo76, 4 months agoThis extension really fell off in the past year. In addition to marking intersex and trans masc people who are not transphobic as being anti-trans, I've noticed actual transphobic accounts being marked as pro-trans? For a while I thought maybe they were just automatically approving accounts that were mass-marked, but after recent discoveries it seems that the devs and mods are just using the extension to mark people they like and don't like. I'm not interested in your personal biases and who is or isn't invited to your tea party, I just want to block actual TERFs and transphobes. Don't use this, it's just another tool that's been twisted to promote community in-fighting.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Uzazi, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by gem, 4 months agotrans men do face specific oppression for being trans men. that does not necessitate that "misandry" as a whole exists, as trans men are not one-to-one with cis men. said oppression is generally based in misogyny, actually. unfortunately, the creators of this app have decided that people who acknowledge this are transphobic/transmisogynistic.
you all have the chance to apologize to your fellow trans people and make this right! there are absolutely transphobic trans people, i'm not disputing that. but you all seem to be very choosy as to what qualifies for that. for example, calling someone "theyfab" is innately transphobic, yet that is allowed to slip by. i've marked transmisogynistic trans men and anti-transmasculine trans women, and only the former stays red universally. stop having double standards, y'all. - Rated 1 out of 5by Remy, 4 months agooriginally started off as a great tool to help identify terfs, radfems, and other conservatives, but recently, people who have been standing up for intersex and transmasc rights and talking about their oppression have resulted in very trans-friendly people being marked as red. unreliable at best and downright dangerous at worst. do better
- Rated 1 out of 5by te, 4 months agono longer trustworthy. people marked trans-positive will say / post blatant transphobic rhetoric as well as attacking other trans people openly. don't get this.
- Rated 1 out of 5by sonder, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by nebula, 4 months agoWorks pretty good! It's easy to use and readable at a glance without being too obtrusive or ugly looking. The multiple color options are great too!
I don't really know what all these other reviews are talking about when they say that transmascs and nonbinary people and intersex people are being marked unfairly, I haven't personally experienced that or seen evidence of intentional malice on the part of the developer or anyone moderating reports. A lot of these reviews focus heavily on transmascs being targeted specifically, but I'm transmasc, and I follow a lot of transmascs and none of the people I follow are red "just for being transmasc"
If you're reading this and you've experienced people being marked as anti-trans when you think they should be trans friendly, or vice versa, you can remark them! You right click with the mouse and then mark them how you think they should be marked! The community itself is the one marking things, so sometimes it does get it wrong
Judging by how some of the people leaving the reviews or posting about it talk though....... maybe it's just working as intended... ._. - Rated 1 out of 5by aworm, 4 months agoUsed to be useful for filtering out TERFs. Shinigami Eyes is useless now since the mods are blatantly against intersex people, and abuse their power against vulnerable community members. Not trustworthy.
- Rated 1 out of 5by termsofuhoh, 4 months agoDevs went off the rails and have started marking intersex people and activists as "transphobic." Very disappointing.