927 reviews
- Rated 2 out of 5by Ulfric, 3 years agoThis was a decent add-on that I forgot about and let run wild, but unfortunately the lack of a whitelist means I cannot get much use out of this anymore. For some reason it recently broke Pocket's inline articles, and I found out from the reviews that it breaks certain features in Gmail as well (which I didn't connect to this add-on until now!). Please add a whitelist, or at least more user flexibility in terms of maneuvering through features that may break important website features.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Case_Of, 3 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Echonly, 3 years agoI uninstalled this extension after using it for more than a day. The default rules have caused me a lot of trouble when browsing the web, and there is no way to set detailed settings.
- Rated 5 out of 5by 22jjjnn, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by SlyArcher, 3 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 17394022, 3 years agoThis ends up breaking several non tracking urls as they sometimes inject history state for functionality.
And the extension doesn't provide a single way to add exceptions and by viewing the github it seems they just plain ignore suggestions.
There is a setting called "The url to the data.json file (rules)" but this does nothing as changing it to several different things still worked in the exact same way.
If you don't use pages that may modify or rely on the url consistency is a great extension but besides that it missing a critical feature. - Rated 3 out of 5by Frans, 3 years agoThis was breaking links from loading, and since this is a "install and forget" type of extension--which is nice, except in this instance--and since there is no link whitelisting, I unfortunately have to disable it. :(
- Rated 2 out of 5by aconamos, 3 years agoThis extension works great other than that it has completely broken google OAuth for me. I have had to disable it which sucks because I really like this extension.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Midnight1, 3 years agoThis add on is bugging as hell, blocks some web sites from loading.
Took me a week to figure out what the problem was.
Disable it and all is well.
I uninstalled it!! - Rated 4 out of 5by Mister GothFvck, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Soulsurfer, 3 years agoein äußerst nützliches Add-on, arbeitet unauffällig im Hintergrund und erledigt genau das, was die Entwickler versprechen!
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 14108734, 3 years agoNeed the ability to WHITELIST certain URLS. It is either on, or off. And when it breaks a website, I have to turn it off completely. Add this please!
- Rated 1 out of 5by Arash Yoosefdoost, 3 years agoThe new version causes many problems. For example, it broke Firefox's back and forward buttons in Gmail. Makes Gmail's unique email links invalid and the page will be redirected to the inbox in case of refreshing. It is a new problem.
In addition, it broke many websites such as banks. Also, prevent plugins such as Boomerang to connect to the Gmail account and broke them.
It was a good Firefox add-on but now cases many serious issues. - Rated 5 out of 5by WildSnakeNYC, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by moneywiseUpfront, 3 years agoIf Google removed the extension from the Chrome Web Store... Then ClearURLs does its job well.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 12370795, 3 years agoA whitelist would have been great.
But the main issue is that it breaks so many website that most of the time I leave it disabled. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13938515, 3 years agoSome URLs doesn't work with last release 1.24.1 when they worked with previous release. Must deactivate ClearURLs to access these URLs. Not terrific.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Dareal Bingoxz, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by tonini, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Aly, 3 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13202285, 3 years agoGreat extension, but it needs a whitelist. Payment portals are sometimes broken.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Adolf.Markl@gmx.de, 3 years agoWas ist mit "fbclid=" + "gclid=" ?
Vorschlag: einzeln An/Aus für jede Klasse dieser Tracks (utm_.*, fbcl.*=, gclid=, ...)?
außerdem: Whitelist wäre wünschenswert. - Rated 5 out of 5by Mingo, 3 years ago