Reviews for In My Pocket
In My Pocket by Pierre-Adrien Buisson
403 reviews
- Rated 4 out of 5by TranceWarp, 8 years agoWorks for those that use Waterfox. However, I would suggest a darker colored icon for use with the default theme. I almost can't see it with that theme.
Developer response
posted 8 years agoThanks for your review! I didn't know about Waterfox, it looks like the UI is the same as regular Firefox theme, isn't it? Anyway I've been doing some work on a new icon lately, I intend to work on some other fixes before releasing this new version, but I'm confident it will make the icon more readable for you! - Rated 3 out of 5by jinijiro, 8 years ago我似乎是第一個下載者, 也是目前唯一的使用者, 但別氣餒, 我相信你還有太多想做而未完成的部分. 我會繼續使用這個 addon, 因為它至少不比內建的差, 雖然還有些 bugs (ex: removes an entry from list makes entry item flashing on list menu from addon button, ..etc; btw, tags editing is more necessary :-)). 很感謝你做出這個 addon, 並希望你能繼續完成所有你想要做出的功能.
Developer response
posted 8 years agoThanks a lot for your support ! I'm also encountering the "flashing" bug on one of my two Firefox instances, and I'm working on solving this right now. Hopefully, I will manage to publish a fix in the days to come :) - Rated 4 out of 5by Axel_Maze, 8 years agoIt's a real shame that the FF Pocket addon has been reduced to a simple button that redirects the web version.
While it is true that this version is still early (there's no configuration options!) It has the basics features to start managing your list of Pocket in a convenient pop-up menu from the toolbar (like the old extension!) .
Bug: I tested the version 0.0.3 (FF 49.0.1 and Windows 7) and when I open the menu, the URL is displayed extremely small.Developer response
posted 8 years agoThank you for your positive comment! There's still lot of room to improve this addon, but it's a start. I need to use my own pocket account everyday so I'll keep on working on it, and I still have a lot of ideas. I'll be looking into your URL font size issue, it was alright on my own Firefox installations but I may have to check again then. Thanks for the insight.