Reviews for Save Page WE
Save Page WE by DW-dev
Review by Firefox user 12552652
Rated 5 out of 5
by Firefox user 12552652, 8 years agoFirefox's native save format is an html file next to a resource folder. These resource folders clutter the local directory, and make it difficult to move, copy, or delete these saves, because every operation needs a pair operation for the folder. Save Page WE (SPWE) solves all these issues by embedding the resource folder in the HTML file. Historically, two other addons do the same thing, UnMHT and Mozilla Archive Format (MAF). Both have special file formats, .mht and .maff respectively, which cannot be opened unless the addon is installed. Since these other addons are deprecated, their special file formats are no longer acceptable. Save Page WE's pure html file format is a clearly superior engineering solution which does not require addons. This review has shrunk in length significantly from its previous versions, thanks to a number of admirable technical improvements by SPWE.
The other two addons produce the save file dialog before constructing the save. Because of this, MAF has severe problems with silent corruption, and UnMHT must detect failure and alert to re-try. SPWE reverses the order, which solves this issue intrinsically.
UnMHT and SPWE have excellent accuracy in their saves, with small differences going either way. MAF falls behind. Native Firefox saving sometimes fails outright to produce a file.
SPWE saves usually have smaller filesize than UnMHT's. SPWE's saving speed is consistently 40% faster than UnMHT, independently of file size. Some pages take 20 seconds to save, so this helps.
SPWE re-downloads resources at the time of saving. (UnMHT does too.) In practice, this almost never causes any change, only with unusual server configurations and livestream thumbnails.
As a WebExtensions addon, SPWE cannot save Firefox Reader pages, because "Firefox and Chrome do not allow loading of content scripts into [about: pages]." A workaround is to save natively as html+folder, host the save with a local web server, and re-save with SPWE. For the local web server, the addon developer suggests the Google Chrome App called “Web Server for Chrome”. Another option is to install python, run "python -m SimpleHTTPServer 8080" in a console, and then navigate to http://localhost:8080/.
The quotations in this review come from the addon developer.
The following considerations exist, but have caused no problems:
"Save Page WE cannot re-save a “.mht” file because Firefox will not load a content script into a page saved by UnMHT." SPWE cannot re-save local html files with "_files" folders, because "Both Firefox and Chrome do not allow a page to access cross-origin local ‘file:’ resources." Both of these problems can be worked around using the local web server trick.
"The JSFiddle results section (lower right quadrant) is contained in a cross-domain sandboxed iframe. Save Page WE saves the contents of same-domain iframes, but does not save the contents of cross-domain iframes.
I have looked at how UnMHT handles this case and, as far as I can see, UnMHT creates a security risk when the saved page is re-opened. This is because the original cross-domain iframe is in effect loaded as a same-domain iframe when the saved page is re-opened." This applies to Disqus as well.
The other two addons produce the save file dialog before constructing the save. Because of this, MAF has severe problems with silent corruption, and UnMHT must detect failure and alert to re-try. SPWE reverses the order, which solves this issue intrinsically.
UnMHT and SPWE have excellent accuracy in their saves, with small differences going either way. MAF falls behind. Native Firefox saving sometimes fails outright to produce a file.
SPWE saves usually have smaller filesize than UnMHT's. SPWE's saving speed is consistently 40% faster than UnMHT, independently of file size. Some pages take 20 seconds to save, so this helps.
SPWE re-downloads resources at the time of saving. (UnMHT does too.) In practice, this almost never causes any change, only with unusual server configurations and livestream thumbnails.
As a WebExtensions addon, SPWE cannot save Firefox Reader pages, because "Firefox and Chrome do not allow loading of content scripts into [about: pages]." A workaround is to save natively as html+folder, host the save with a local web server, and re-save with SPWE. For the local web server, the addon developer suggests the Google Chrome App called “Web Server for Chrome”. Another option is to install python, run "python -m SimpleHTTPServer 8080" in a console, and then navigate to http://localhost:8080/.
The quotations in this review come from the addon developer.
The following considerations exist, but have caused no problems:
"Save Page WE cannot re-save a “.mht” file because Firefox will not load a content script into a page saved by UnMHT." SPWE cannot re-save local html files with "_files" folders, because "Both Firefox and Chrome do not allow a page to access cross-origin local ‘file:’ resources." Both of these problems can be worked around using the local web server trick.
"The JSFiddle results section (lower right quadrant) is contained in a cross-domain sandboxed iframe. Save Page WE saves the contents of same-domain iframes, but does not save the contents of cross-domain iframes.
I have looked at how UnMHT handles this case and, as far as I can see, UnMHT creates a security risk when the saved page is re-opened. This is because the original cross-domain iframe is in effect loaded as a same-domain iframe when the saved page is re-opened." This applies to Disqus as well.
450 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16745788, 5 hours agoБольшое спасибо! Пользуюсь редко, но выручает именно она
- Rated 5 out of 5by 敬念法轮大法好远离瘟疫, 21 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Pavel, a month agoDear Developer,
I’m writing to provide feedback on Save Page WE. I’ve noticed that the extension saves the web page exactly as it is rendered at the moment of saving. As a result, any content hidden behind spoilers (which remain collapsed) is not included in the saved file. This has been somewhat inconvenient, as I often need to preserve the entire content of a page.
Would it be possible to add an option in the extension’s settings to automatically expand spoiler sections (or other similar hidden elements) before saving the page? This feature would greatly enhance the usefulness of Save Page WE for users who regularly work with pages containing expandable content.
Thank you for your hard work on this excellent tool, and I look forward to any improvements you might consider.
Best regards,
Pavel - Rated 5 out of 5by Nikitamce, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 退出中共邪教党团队保命, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18582702, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13462872, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Zing, 3 months agoAs a regular user of Save Page WE, I appreciate its ability to save entire web pages as single HTML files, making subsequent editing straightforward. This functionality surpasses Firefox's standard save feature, offering more accurate archiving and easier modification of saved pages.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Radioamatoro, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18709981, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14295457, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Víctor A. Rodríguez (Bit-Man), 6 months agoGreat tool!
One single problem I have is not allowing to download www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js but entering it in my browser can be shown and downloaded - Rated 4 out of 5by AnneF, 6 months agoI used to love and depend on this extension. I switched to Firefox ESR and now I can't get the icon to display on the toolbar when I install the extension.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13545908, 7 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Bellykid, 7 months agoIt doesn't let you do anything on the page. It's just a image.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Noel Miles, 7 months agoNo doubt, the best offline page saver. Saved my fandom guide without effort and access it smootly without destroying the web. Thumbs up!
- Rated 5 out of 5by 雲霖, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18594010, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Arthur, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by eggv83, 8 months agoThis was a huge help in saving some service manuals from my auto manufacturer that stopped offering PDF versions of their documents and because "normal saving" of the HTML through the web browser didn't preserve the page formatting, hyperlinks (within the same webpage), and images. I had a couple errors or incomplete saves at first, but the add-on configuration tip that popped up resolved them.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alfred, 8 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by andreasdo, 9 months agoGreat tool to one click save a whole page, but I miss a different autosave directory in the settings.