Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
1,007 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Danny, 4 months agoIt used to be a useful tool to flag terfs and other transphobes, but lately the moderators have been just flagging a bunch of intersex people and trans men... Completely useless now. If you see someone marked red 9 times out of 10 they're intersex or transmasc.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Roark, 4 months agoits become beyond useless... lately im seeing way too many trolls marked green
- Rated 1 out of 5by babcha, 4 months agoThis extension used to be helpful, but now transmasc, intersex people, and their allies are being falsely labeled as trans-unfriendly. Heartbreaking, really.
- Rated 1 out of 5by W., 4 months agoThis addon is being actively used to target transmasc people online. There are a significant number of transphobic people marked safe because their transphobia is "acceptable" to the creators of this addon and a significant number of people incorrectly marked as unsafe because they support trans people the creators of this addon don't like. Used to appreciate this app, but it's now just being used for lateral violence.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Maggie, 4 months agoAs of recently, it's become very unreliable. Like other people are mentioning here, people are being marked as red that really shouldn't be, like folks who talk about issues that intersex and transmasculine people face. :(
- Rated 1 out of 5by Grey, 4 months agoI love the concept of this extension and have been using this extension for years now, but it has become extremely unreliable nowadays with the creator's own prejudices affecting moderation. Lots of people are being falsely flagged as transphobic just for being supportive of intersex folk and sometimes for no reason at all so I would recommend steering clear of this one.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Lambda, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by bit, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by ShibePatrol, 4 months agoUsed to be good, but now there are a lot of pro-trans and intersex accounts being marked red for no good reason at all, to the point that it's becoming completely unreliable
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ale, 4 months agoWithout notes where one could link specific posts to show the reasons behind ratings, people can't tell if someone is marked red because they are actually anti-trans or if the person marking them just didn't agree with some of their opinions. Now intersex and trans-friendly accounts (example: status-quo-hater and hellsitegenetics on tumblr) are getting marked as red for petty reasons, making the extension worse than useless at its only job.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17163781, 4 months agoused to be pretty solid, but now anyone talking about intersex or transmasc issues gets flagged as transphobic :(
- Rated 1 out of 5by Albino, 4 months agoVery unreliable. Not recomended.
Accounts that are supportive of trans people are being falsely reported as unsafe, i've espcially noticed a lot of false reports on accounts from people who are intersex being marked as unsafe despite the fact that they have several recent posts that are supportive of trans people.
The moderation is practically nonexistant and its fueling the infighting rather than actually properly marking transphobic accounts.
This extension could *technically* still be used, as a way to raise a little warning flag before interacting with a potentially transphobic account, but you Must make sure to verify the persons actual stance before blocking them, as you may actually be blocking someone supportive. - Rated 1 out of 5by KC, 4 months agoHUGE problem with reporting POC or otherwise marginalized communities within the queer community so it's completely unreliable
- Rated 1 out of 5by Dynamia, 4 months agoTransphobic against intersex people, if your reading this please uninstall it.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15020646, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by uncannyplatypus, 4 months agoAs I've found myself finding more community among trans people online, particularly among trans women such as myself, I've found this program more unhelpful. This program gets misused, and there is absolutely developer bias at play. Intersex activists, for example, get baselessly marked anti-trans. For this type of abuse, I can't leave a good review.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Never Jhonsen, 4 months agoWhile this can be good for finding and avoiding many transphobic and other problematic sites, the creators are unfortunately transphobic against intersex people :\ Meaning that this can not be reliably trusted
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ash, 4 months agoI've been using Shinigami Eyes for years now, and I thought it was a resource that I could trust as a transgender man. Evidently, I was wrong. I'm beyond disappointed that the dev(s) are stooping to the levels of bigotry I once trusted them to alert me to.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18727627, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Sorceress Eve, 4 months agoOnce upon a time, this extension was decent (never been more).
Whilst I haven't seen it myself (due to rarely accessing sites where this extension even works, which is another problem with it for another time). I believe my trans brothers, sisters, and siblings that this extension has been marking trans-masc, non-binary, intersex people, and people of colour as anti-trans for talking about their own unique issues/struggles.
And from what they've said, this extension has become the very thing it swore to fight against. If you believe in human rights at all, stay away from this disgrace of an extension. - Rated 1 out of 5by shar, 4 months agoUsed to be a helpful addon, but more recently I keep finding accounts that are falsely flagged as transphobic purely for the account being run by transmasculine or intersex individuals. There are also a number of accounts that are marked trans-friendly by this addon that utilize transphobia against other trans people on a regular basis. Devs/moderators also don't consider slurs targeting nonbinary and transmasc individuals to be transphobic.
- Rated 1 out of 5by grae, 4 months agothis used to be useful, but has recently repeatedly marked pro-trans people, including very open advocates for the transgender community, as transphobic.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Limesar, 4 months agoyou'd think the developer(s) for this kind of extension would aim to support ALL kinds of trans people... and yet recently, that hasn't been the case.
just to list a few examples:
--transmascs and trans people of color talking about their experiences have been getting flagged as transphobic, even when they very much advocate for trans people
--intersex people and advocates have similarly been getting flagged as transphobic, especially intersex women who describe themselves using the term "afab transfem"
--a recent change to the guidelines has decided that using transphobic/enby-phobic slurs is no longer enough on its own to justify being marked as transphobic (to add further insult to injury, these slurs were downplayed merely as "mean words" to "communicate perceived problems within the trans community")
it's very disheartening to see what was once a nice, reliable extension being used to exclude subgroups of trans people instead. this sort of behavior only serves to hurt the trans community as a whole, and i can't in good conscience recommend this to anyone who *actually* wishes to support trans, nonbinary, and intersex people. - Rated 1 out of 5by Astral, 4 months agoRun by a hate group who are actively targeting people of color, intersex people, transmasc people. Radical terrorists. This needs to be removed.