Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
956 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Rufus Mortuary Felix, a month agocompletely useless for the purpose of accurately flagging anti-trans accounts.
moderators have been proven to be bad actors in regards to trans men, trans mascs, and intersex people who both do and do not consider themselves trans.
moderators have proven time and time again that they believe trans men and trans masc individuals are not adequately trans enough, and that accurately speaking on issues that directly affect them (transmasculine individuals) in particular is somehow equivalent to being transmisogynistic. (100% untrue, and is transphobic as a policy.)
their policies are guided by radical feminist beliefs, putting them more in line with the TERFS they claim to want to flag than it does with other members of the queer community who are being put in danger by the moderators of this addon's personal bigotries. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18730325, a month agoThere's no point in an extension like this if intra community drama and disagreements are going to be treated with the same attitude as actual facists and actively violent hate groups. Since the update that allows for people to be flagged as transphobic for advocating for the whole trans community and for intersex rights, this tool has become completely useless.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Rott144, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18759690, a month agoAside from false flagging many legitimate feminists and average non-hateful people, this add-on randomly activated itself again after I had it deactivated for months. Links started suddenly showing up as green on different webpages and in private windows--despite me never allowing it to run in private windows.
- Rated 1 out of 5by sunny, a month ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by frank, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Jupiter, a month agoMarks users as anti-trans for speaking about intersex issues, not for being transphobic. Completely defeats the purpose of the extension.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14660526, a month agoPeople who are trans-friendly but spoken about intersex topics have been marked incorrectly. I'll no longer be using this extension as it has really lost it's purpose recently with the incorrect marking of people
- Rated 1 out of 5by Vin, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Mze, a month agoLack of moderation/quality control has lead to social media accounts being marked red just on the basis of, being disliked by whoever is redmarking them, or something. Since this lack of moderation means you have to individually check accounts and research their opinions on trans people anyway then this add-on is pretty useless, especially considering how many permissions it needs to be granted
- Rated 1 out of 5by WillowMelody, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18753693, a month agoused to be great but now random people are marked as anti-trans for things like discussing multi-sexed bird species. not sure if this is because flags are no longer being reviewed or if this is a purposeful choice by the creator(s). either way, this is useless now. how do i know if someone is red because they think transgender people should be put to death, or because they just talked about nudibranchs one time? disappointing.
- Rated 1 out of 5by thatmycar, a month agoCompletely useless now. Trans advocates and actual trans and intersex people are marked red for absolutely no reason, other than speaking out about their unsanitized experiences while those calling for the deaths or excommunication of those trans women, trans men, intersex and non-binary people are green. The people running this shit extension are insanely intersexist, which is disappointing. Miss when this thing worked.
- Rated 1 out of 5by queza, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15990438, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by junko, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18752674, a month agoUsed to be very helpful, but poor moderation has led to trans and intersex people being flagged for discussing issues directly related to them, which completely nullifies any usefulness and, worse, actively harms the community.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17534287, a month agoaddon is frequently abused to falsly label trans (especially transmasc) and intersex people as transphobic
this needs to be fixed for an addon like this to be trustworthy - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18291972, a month agoused to be really useful for spotting innocuously-named terfs and transphobe groups, but now it seems like random trans and intersex people are marked as red cause of stupid intracommunity discourse and that really waters it down to the point of uselessness. i dont care if some trans person is posting about being a dude or being intersex in a way that some other trans people dont like, i care if someone is posting shit about the divine feminine womb energy and how trans people are coming for your children. those do not belong in the same category.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Ivia Relle, a month agoHas been increasingly plagued with falsely red users/accounts on multiple sites, often simply for speaking about intersex or transmasc issues. This has always been a small issue with the extension, but it's become widespread recently, and makes it completely unreliable for its purpose as written.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Protofem, a month agountrustable moderation, the dev explicitly allows for ace-phobic content, while not mentioning a stance on other forms of non-trans LGBT-phobia. People using this extension are targeting transmascs and intersex users and the devs which do "human review" are enabling and engaging in it.
- Rated 1 out of 5by mars, a month agoI'm seeing more and more people who are vitriolic towards trans men marked green while people who are actively trans-supportive and even a local trans activist in my community are marked red
- Rated 1 out of 5by tee, a month agono longer useful for what i had been using it for, as someone who is intersex + trans i'm disappointed in the criteria changes and apparent hostility towards intersex trans people.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18748589, a month ago