Reviews for Swift Selection Search
Swift Selection Search by Daniel Lobo
671 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by mohsen, 5 years agoخفنه خیلی خوب است اگر ساعت و دیوار باهم دوست بشوند و میخ تو کون دیوار نشه
Developer response
posted 5 years agoAlthough I don't understand, I appreciate the review. ;) Cheers! - Rated 5 out of 5by stacyayako, 5 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by weder, 5 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Jonas, 5 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by The Stallion, 5 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by SP77, 5 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Freeman769, 5 years agoOne of the best addons ! I subscribed just to post this, after "liquid words" was discontinued, I waited for an addon like that, and now I can tell this one is even better, Thanks !
Developer response
posted 5 years agoThank you very much for taking that extra time on purpose to review this addon. ;) Cheers! - Rated 5 out of 5by mortyobnoxious, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Hasan Tahsin, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14346878, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Hasan Tahsin, 6 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 15037318, 6 years ago---13/04/2025: TO THE DEVELOPER DANIEL LOBO (FEATURE REQUEST):
The site that gets the favicon icons has retired. I could not get the icons for:
www dot alfred dot com
www dot henle dot de
www dot halleonard do com
---06/09/2020: TO THE DEVELOPER DANIEL LOBO (FEATURE REQUEST):
Could you add a feature where I could open a set of searches that are within two separators? As I usually group similar searches between two separators. Thanks.
A huge time saver addon to do many searches very quickly to google maps, youtube, google translate, and many more.
You can even add any site to search if you want.
AMAZING ADDON!
A tip on creating and adding your own custom searches by doing a search on a site that you are interested in. Do the search on the site you want with a keyword of your choice and then replace this keyword with {searchTerms}
Example: en dot wikipedia dot org slash wiki Special:Search?search={searchTerms}
This way, there are many sites where you can easily create your own custom searches and add them to the ones you already have available by default with this great addon Swift Selection Search.
Many thanks to the developer for this addon.Developer response
posted 5 years agoWow, you are welcome! And thank you for the review, I really appreciate it. :) - Rated 5 out of 5by Jay163, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by coolwills, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Paul Dereume, 6 years agoThis is nice. Was able to create custom searches. Thank you.
- Rated 5 out of 5by --FIRE--, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15266683, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Stylefox, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Tilo, 6 years agoDas ist mal wirklich hilfreiches Addon. Vor allem, das man die zu verwendeten Seiten selbst anpassen kann. Ich nutze es schon einige Zeit und kann nichts negatives dazu sagen. Danke!
Developer response
posted 5 years agoDanke schön! :) (And sorry for the late reply. I wish I could say that in german too! ;)) - Rated 5 out of 5by Abdulhameed, 6 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Andreas, 6 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 15145534, 6 years agocould you make an option/shortcut to open selected text in terminal (/usr/bin/gnome-terminal)?
- Rated 5 out of 5by George's collection, 6 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Aquila, 6 years agoExpansion can be and good, BUT it is necessary to add search plug-ins manually, it is a lot of unnecessary settings, and here in the Selection Context Search expansion everything is established automatically https://b.radikal.ru/b30/1907/9a/c048b4a524c8.jpg
P.S. Dear Daniel, if you have time and an opportunity create here such plug-in to the addition, (that "SEARCH" automatic was added on any websites, as on a screenshot) then it the price will not be.
Good luck! https://c.radikal.ru/c08/1907/19/4d077a9e4aea.jpgDeveloper response
posted 6 years agoHi there and thanks for the review! :)
I understand, but it's hard for me to maintain a decent list of search engines up to date for SSS's users, so I prefer if people add their own engines. You can also import the ones you use in the browser. People suggested creating a webpage where users could add the engines they are using, like a Wiki, though that would also have to be moderated and it's really hard to do that in my free time.
Regarding the unnecessary settings, I also don't use most of the options, but almost all were user-suggested via email, GitHub or in reviews, so someone is finding them useful. ;) If you have ideas about what to do about them without removing them, I accept feedback!
Cheers,
Daniel