Reviews for Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context by Wikiwand
122 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18743018, 3 months agoStarted as a fantastic skin/custom CSS for wikipedia. Now turned into some sort of weird corporate product pushing AI summaries and an ungodly amount of ads! Ads on wikipedia??? Have you gone insane?
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18725086, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Joey, 4 months agoDoes not enhance the user experience of Wikipedia at all. Instead, it changes the look slightly and then bombards you with pop-ups trying to get you to buy their AI service whenever you try to read an article.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Parakeet709, 4 months agoSwitched to another extension after all these AI features rolled out. Just wanted to change the look of articles, but now I can't even do that because its bundled with the paid AI features. If you're looking for a modern and sleek way to make Wikipedia look nice, either get Dark Reader, which lets you keep the default design but make it dark mode, or Modern for Wikipedia, which makes it look nicer, lets you change between shades from white to black and a light brown, and lastly lets you adjust stuff with the text.
I was not sponsored to say this, by the way, this is just my own opinion. I love the style of Wikiwand, but the AI features being forced on causing other design features to be behind a paywall caused me to list alternatives for people reading this. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18666384, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Gigatron, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18655778, 5 months agoUsed to be good, now just full of premium pop-ups, AI, and selling user data.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13885454, 5 months agoBring back the Pre-AI version... New version is garbage... Have opted for a different extension
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pierson Moore, 5 months agoThis extension has become unusable. I don't want to sign in to save my formatting settings, it takes 4 clicks to get rid of the stupid popup and then you also have to clear the AI popup. I really don't care if Wikiwand has AI in it or not but stop shoving it down our throats. set it off to the corner of the page and don't open the AI chat/summary until the user requests it.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Mtro, 5 months agoUsed to be a very nice wikipedia skin. But like so many things, it's been turned into a business that adds all kind of things I don't want--especially AI. I'll just go back to regular wikipedia.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18641858, 5 months agoI loved Wikiwand for years but the AI stuff is just too much. I don't want AI to dumb down a Wikipedia article for me, I can read just fine thanks! The rest of your features are not worth the headache of popups begging me to use AI so I'll pay for more functionality. Uninstalling!
- Rated 1 out of 5by aszl, 5 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15046301, 5 months agoWere the new AI features worth losing thousands of users? Your job is to pretty up wikipedia, not nagging me every time to login and use AI features. Bye bye.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18625533, 5 months agoUsed to be lightweight and unobtrusive. Bloated with unnecessary AI features now.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Sebi, 5 months agoIt used to be a really great extension that made Wikipedia much nicer. And then a "genius" came up with the idea of integrating AI - and monetization at every turn. A great reading experience becomes a supermarket advertisement. Horrible. Everything ruined after so many years.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17871572, 6 months agoWhat a great addon it was! One of my essentials. 5/5 for like, years. You can **** off with this AI *** though. Not even gonna install it ever again, seeing if something has changed. You're done. 1/5, never recommending it to my friends, never trying it again. You've had one "job".... Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Also, Wiki has a dark mode now. This is all some of us needed. Thanks for ******* it up. - Rated 1 out of 5by PsCxLT, 6 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18576897, 6 months agoI used to love the UI improvements that Wikiwand made to wikipedia, but now they have filled their website with an AI chatbot, ads, popups, content locked behind an account, and other useless features. I will no longer be using wikiwand.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Jakey, 6 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by taki, 6 months agoIt used to be good some time ago. Last update made Wikipedia's Main page to appear broken introducing an AI chatbot and most customization features available before (including black theme) are now locked behind a monthly subscription paywall which promotes other AI features.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Agent Retard (CIA Employee), 6 months agoThis extension used to be good, not anymore. Aint paying a single penny. AI horsesht garbage
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14338612, 6 months agoThis takes the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia and warps it into a mess filled with ads and shady connections. (At least) one of the developers has intellectually, materially and technologically benefited a discriminatory settler-colonial regime, which adds a disturbing layer to the whole project. This is the perfect example of 'entrepreneurs' taking someone else's hard work and making money off of it, all the while violating the spirit of the creation. Thanks but no, thanks. I'll stick to the boring old 'outdated' version of the site that the community has been diligently working on for ages instead of this AI filled garbage :)
Edit: forgot to add - check out how many servers worldwide this thing is shaking hands with in the background while you're reading your article on Nabataea or the Achaemenids. You might be terribly surprised.
Edit 2: From the horse's own mouth
We also collect information when you make use of the Site, including your browsing history. [...]
By analyzing all information we receive, we may compile statistical information across a variety of users (“Statistical Information”). Statistical Information helps understand trends and customer needs so that new services can be considered and so the Site and associated services can be tailored to customer desires. We may share Statistical Information with our partners, pursuant to commercial terms that we determine in our sole discretion. - Rated 1 out of 5by DeAndre Queary, 6 months agoUsed this forever. But now the AI crap is annoying. Wikipedia has a nice looking site now. I don't need this bloat anymore. Also, don't pay for this mess. Give your money to Wikipedia directly.