Reviews for Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context by Wikiwand
635 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Eugenia, 3 years agoI adore it, makes Wikipedia even more engaging and pleasant to read.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Manmohan Singh Sajwan, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17333746, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15497298, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15088084, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Homayoon, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16963261, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16572602, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16720396, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ander, 3 years agoWhat a brilliant idea! It makes WP look like a hip magazine. It's much more pleasant and easier to use. I frequently edit WP, and wondered if it might interfere with that. But the Edit command is right there in one of the new menus, and editing session open in a new tab, in the original format. Nicely done! Thanks!
- Rated 5 out of 5by rob, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16631916, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by all9n, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Vedun, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17018200, 3 years agoUsed to be great. Now it is bloated, and confusing. Garbage AI feature, advertisement, overly complicated settings, missing language change... So many bad decisions. I chose a new addon for the old facelift I used to achieve with this addon.
I left the old review below:
Excellent addon. Makes Wikipedia look 21st Century web encyclopedia. - Rated 3 out of 5by Fatyanoor Ashfa, 3 years agoI don't think this is for me - it's so unlike Wikipedia. I did start to appreciate it after trying it for some time (I especially like the nav bar on the left), but I also encountered quite a lot of issues, so I think I'll stick to regular Wikipedia in the meantime.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13641253, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by choual, 3 years agoCette extension n'améliore pas Wikipedia, elle vous redirige juste vers un autre site en s’appropriant le contenu de Wikipedia.. À fuir.
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 13318527, 4 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lucky_Noob, 4 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by mngx, 4 years ago