Reviews for Zoom Page WE
Zoom Page WE by DW-dev
490 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by George, 7 years agousing FF 57.0 I had high CPU and script errors flashing up and generally slow with annoying cpu FAST fan running. Have changed to FF58.0B6 and all problems have gone. Maybe the problems are firefox's rather than WE 7.2. Can others try it and report here?
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13526688, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by DeronLJ, 7 years agoI'm glad this got ported to a WebExtension. Mozilla has made it hard for add-on developers.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13523845, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by terauck, 7 years agoWhen I load html pages which are on my computer (created by me) the extension does NOT remember settings for them.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13511085, 7 years agoit does not allow me to retain different settings for different sites. it is terrible so that begs the question why has zoom been changed from the old efficient method. i switched back to firefox 55.0.3 so that i can use zoom page 15.8. this situation is terrible and should not be tolerated
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13507221, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13492250, 7 years agoBeing visually disabled Zoom Page has been an essential aid for me for many years. I could not do without it. Unfortunately the new version seems harder to use, so I went back to FF 52.
The plus/minus buttons showing next to the current magnification level are what I need. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13492049, 7 years agoI installed this plugin into my Mozilla (v57.0, 64 bit) and it does not work.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13489832, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13486442, 7 years agoIt works more or less as replacement for the old ZoomPage addon, but one thing is missing: It's no longer possible to show large images entirely on the screen. For example this picture
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/Tour_Eiffel_Wikimedia_Commons.jpg
would need a zoom level below 30% on my screen. There should be a button to automatically chose the correct zoom level so that the complete image is displayed. - Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 13484750, 7 years agoYour add-on breaks the ability to show pictures such as JPG in the browser (direct link to a jpeg, in its own tab, not on a web page).
Confirmed that the pics display correctly as soon as I disable Zoom Page WE, and break as soon as I re-enable it.
When I look at the page information, Firefox reports that the picture is 0pt x 0pt big.
Please fix (or remove "picture zoom" altogether, since this is not really why we install Zoom Page WE) - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13470025, 7 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Palli, 7 years agoVery good in general.
But missing the option to set page AND texzoom to seperate values oon the same page. - Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 13365012, 7 years agowork on 32 bit version, _does not_ (or works wrongly) work on 64 bit, pay attention to it pls
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13372727, 7 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13452927, 7 years agohorrible just horrible compared to the original zoom page
- Rated 4 out of 5by GaryOB, 7 years agoVersion 5.2 to 7.1 all say they will work for FF 51.0 and later. When I tried 7.1 it did not work. I am using FF 56.0. The strange thing is that Mozilla addons thinks I am using FF 50.0 and gives me this warning:
This add-on requires a newer version of Firefox (at least version 51.0). You are using Firefox 50.0.
So I am using Version 5.1 and it works correctly. - Rated 2 out of 5by Jack, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Yurii, 7 years agoGreat, but the inclusion of "Use CSS full zoom instead of browser full zoom" breaks the work of google maps, may need an exception list?
- Rated 1 out of 5by PeteScape, 7 years agoI used it for 1 second. Now I am back to the "old Zoom Page" and still using "old" Firefox 52.4 ..ESR.. (Manually updating :-) ) together with "latest" PaleMoon. I don't need a Trabant Browser... Mozilla..haha.. Remember, I don't come back after december.. :-(
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 12534716, 7 years ago