Revisiones de Cookie Quick Manager
Cookie Quick Manager por Ysard
Revisado por Rulatir
Se valoró con 2 de 5
por Rulatir, hace 7 añosInitially promissing but just flat out stops working after a while. I add a cookie correctly for the domain (both dotted and not dotted, tried both ways), enter name and value, enter path '/', check the session checkbox. I expect the cookie to be sent to the domain with requests. It doesn't get sent. After a while it disappears, i.e. the search can no longer find it.
Promising but broken.
EDIT to reply to the add-on's author's response:
I know when cookies can be refreshed. The site in question is one I am developing, and the cookie is neither interacted with on the client side, nor ever set by the server; it's just a flag to enable certain debugging functionality and it used to be a GET param but we decided to switch to a cookie and use an add-on like yours to set it whenever we need.
Unfortunately I don't have time to debug your add-on, I simply need one that JustWorks™, and in fact I found one.
Promising but broken.
EDIT to reply to the add-on's author's response:
I know when cookies can be refreshed. The site in question is one I am developing, and the cookie is neither interacted with on the client side, nor ever set by the server; it's just a flag to enable certain debugging functionality and it used to be a GET param but we decided to switch to a cookie and use an add-on like yours to set it whenever we need.
Unfortunately I don't have time to debug your add-on, I simply need one that JustWorks™, and in fact I found one.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 7 añosHi your feedback is interesting;
Nevertheless, I use this addon frequently and to my knowledge the use case you mention is functional...
However, no project is immune to a bug and you should create an issue on the project submission so that we can better understand what you are trying to do. This platform is dedicated to managing bug reports and improvement proposals while addons-mozilla.org is dedicated notations.
Basically a cookie can be refreshed/deleted by JavaScript code without reloading a page, or every time a page is viewed manually.
If you put content in the cookie that the server does not recognize as valid or that does not match the content of other cookies on the same site, or if you put information from an expired session on the server side (you can't really know that), the server may decide at any time to delete or modify your cookie.
This is totally independent of browser configuration or addon behavior.
Have you tried to visualize the status of your cookie via the Firefox development tools Ctrl+Shift+K, "Storage" tab?
You will find more information on these sites:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Cookies#Session_cookies
--
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4132095/when-does-a-cookie-with-expiration-time-at-end-of-session-expire
"This is entirely up to the user agent, i.e. the user's browser, but usually, that will indeed be when the browser is closed"
--
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/33692/what-typically-is-the-expiration-date-of-a-session-cookie
"Cookies that 'expire at end of the session' expire unpredictably from the user's perspective!"
"If there is no expiry set on the cookie, then it is a session cookie and will live as long as the browser is open, and the sessionid is valid. If the server expires the authenticated sessions periodically, then the cookie will no longer be attached to a session on the server and will therefore be essentially null."
EDIT to reply to the Rulatir's response:
Have you thought about clicking on the button "Save the current cookie" to finalize the creation of your new cookie? I only see this explanation.
I'm just asking for a full bug report describing the situation. As it stands I can only say that this addon works because I can not reproduce your approach on various sites I tested: The addon uses the Mozilla's APIs to create the cookies and the cookie is actually created in the database AND sent by GET requests with the other cookies.
Nevertheless, I use this addon frequently and to my knowledge the use case you mention is functional...
However, no project is immune to a bug and you should create an issue on the project submission so that we can better understand what you are trying to do. This platform is dedicated to managing bug reports and improvement proposals while addons-mozilla.org is dedicated notations.
Basically a cookie can be refreshed/deleted by JavaScript code without reloading a page, or every time a page is viewed manually.
If you put content in the cookie that the server does not recognize as valid or that does not match the content of other cookies on the same site, or if you put information from an expired session on the server side (you can't really know that), the server may decide at any time to delete or modify your cookie.
This is totally independent of browser configuration or addon behavior.
Have you tried to visualize the status of your cookie via the Firefox development tools Ctrl+Shift+K, "Storage" tab?
You will find more information on these sites:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Cookies#Session_cookies
--
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4132095/when-does-a-cookie-with-expiration-time-at-end-of-session-expire
"This is entirely up to the user agent, i.e. the user's browser, but usually, that will indeed be when the browser is closed"
--
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/33692/what-typically-is-the-expiration-date-of-a-session-cookie
"Cookies that 'expire at end of the session' expire unpredictably from the user's perspective!"
"If there is no expiry set on the cookie, then it is a session cookie and will live as long as the browser is open, and the sessionid is valid. If the server expires the authenticated sessions periodically, then the cookie will no longer be attached to a session on the server and will therefore be essentially null."
EDIT to reply to the Rulatir's response:
Have you thought about clicking on the button "Save the current cookie" to finalize the creation of your new cookie? I only see this explanation.
I'm just asking for a full bug report describing the situation. As it stands I can only say that this addon works because I can not reproduce your approach on various sites I tested: The addon uses the Mozilla's APIs to create the cookies and the cookie is actually created in the database AND sent by GET requests with the other cookies.
385 revisiones
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por shib, hace 5 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18201896, hace 22 días
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por t3 ur u4 to c3, hace un mespretty good but there should be an option to restore recently deleted cookies. my colour scheme got weird for even basic searches after removing all my cookies (i didn't know at the time that some cookies can be useful)
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por たやまみ, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Tofuwuerfel, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19114790, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Gordon Freeman, hace 6 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por FTMLIFESTYLE, hace 7 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Simon Morgan, hace 8 mesesTerrible UI. The delete button looks like it deletes the current cookie(s), but actually deletes all of them.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Jackie Daytona, hace 9 meses
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por molitar, hace 9 mesesWas unable to capture the entire cookie so was useless to me I needed the entire cf_clearance=
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18767193, hace un año
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por idsks111, hace un añoOn clicking the icon in toolbar, blackened text and background appears rendering it unusable.
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Dan, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Pete, hace un añoWorks great! Especially handy for managing multiple containers
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por jcfyre, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Trin, hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por gmonly, hace un añorequires Container Tabs to be usable, I have it enabled and this extension will not allow me to use Cookie Quick Manager, if I could give it a negative 5 stars, I would for that reason
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por rabia, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por flv12, hace un año
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Андрей, hace un año