Revisiones de IPvFoo
IPvFoo por Paul Marks
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 14049879
Se valoró con 1 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 14049879, hace 7 añosDoes not work on my system: In the column where the ip should appear, there it says only "access denied".
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
40 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por vertigont17, hace 21 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Wolf786, hace 23 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Tempdirz, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17087931, hace 9 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18373085, hace un añoexactly what I was looking for... Thanks!
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por tux, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Tim, hace 2 añosFor those worried about "Access your data for all websites", this is an unavoidable problem with addon permission scopes. Put by the purported (likely?) author on a forum:
> IPvFoo author here. The problem is that there's no way to obtain the (hostname, ip) stream from Chrome/Firefox without requesting the "all websites" permission.
> In theory, browser vendors could define a narrowly-scoped permission that only reports (hostname, ip), or roll this functionality into the browser UI, but neither seems likely to happen.
> I made IPvFoo to promote IPv6 adoption, and wouldn't consider selling it for less than $10M USD. It probably won't ever be worth that much because it's an easily-cloned utility without a "moat", but it's more rational to set a price than refuse to sell under any circumstances.
The addon is open source, and if you insisted, could be built/installed manually. However, I trust it for now from here on AMO.
UPDATE: Thanks for confirming, Paul!Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 años> purported (likely?) author
Yes, that was me (p1mrx on HN) - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Sharky, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por 葉稔, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Baptiste, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Caliban, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Rodolfo R@mírez..., hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por gomers., hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16855318, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por takeshi0303, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13845156, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16393218, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Abdul Rauf, hace 5 añosThis should be the recommended extension by firefox. Source code is available at https://github.com/pmarks-net/ipvfoo so I think this can be trusted after review
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por somnitek, hace 5 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por hbermon, hace 5 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Marcone C.A, hace 5 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por 章灵北, hace 5 añosThanks!a VERY perfect extension to view whether the website give priority to IPV6.