Revisiones de Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers por Firefox
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 17168040
Se valoró con 4 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 17168040, hace 4 añosVery close to perfect! A lot of great features! Excellent for both security and privacy. Just a couple of points keeping it from 5 stars:
1st: We need an option so that all tabs set to open in a container by default won't prompt the user to ask if they want to open a link in its assigned container. It should just do it.
2nd: "The Manage Site List..." menu needs an option to manually enter a web address. Currently the only option is to use the address bar button while navigating, but this can break some re-direct heavy sites. Slack logins, for instance, may go through several different corporate domains in an instant and will break in horribly painful ways if one of those URLs isn't allowed to open in the container holding the login cookie.
3rd: Mozilla VPN is a good idea, but its implementation would be less vulnerable to traffic profiling attacks if it were on by default on all containers and each individual container had a separate opt-out option instead of the current enable option. I'd also like if the service weren't tied to specific Firefox accounts, or had a multi-account payment plan, so that I could use it on my work and home accounts at the same time.
4th: This is just a wish-list thing, but I'd absolutely adore it if you allowed us to use third party VPN logins instead of Mozilla VPN. This would be really great for tunneling into VPNs tied to router networks in the home or at work as if the user were physically on location. A lot of companies do this for security and including this could really help adoption.
Address at least the first three of these and you'll get five stars!
1st: We need an option so that all tabs set to open in a container by default won't prompt the user to ask if they want to open a link in its assigned container. It should just do it.
2nd: "The Manage Site List..." menu needs an option to manually enter a web address. Currently the only option is to use the address bar button while navigating, but this can break some re-direct heavy sites. Slack logins, for instance, may go through several different corporate domains in an instant and will break in horribly painful ways if one of those URLs isn't allowed to open in the container holding the login cookie.
3rd: Mozilla VPN is a good idea, but its implementation would be less vulnerable to traffic profiling attacks if it were on by default on all containers and each individual container had a separate opt-out option instead of the current enable option. I'd also like if the service weren't tied to specific Firefox accounts, or had a multi-account payment plan, so that I could use it on my work and home accounts at the same time.
4th: This is just a wish-list thing, but I'd absolutely adore it if you allowed us to use third party VPN logins instead of Mozilla VPN. This would be really great for tunneling into VPNs tied to router networks in the home or at work as if the user were physically on location. A lot of companies do this for security and including this could really help adoption.
Address at least the first three of these and you'll get five stars!
7882 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15358174, hace 3 horasThe click target for Container management could be a tad larger for repeatable precision, Otherwise works as described. Android Implementation is much appreciated.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Steve, hace 7 horasI just love what this extension does, preventing cross-talk between activated Container tabs! There is one, rather large, caveat, however, in that when initially setting up a URL in a designated Container, it easily completed, and it looks like you're done! BUT... the next time you use that URL (say you Bookmarked it), you are presented with a Container verification screen, where you have to say, "Yes, I actually DO WANT to use the Container that I thought that I already HAD set up!" What this means is that once you setup a URL to a Container, you have to immediately TRY that URL (possibly Bookmarked) to answer that verification page. THEN...everything works as expected. I consider it an inconvenience, but once you are used to jumping thru the hoops, its 2nd nature. And that does not detract from the purpose or function of the extension!
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14991062, hace un díaWorks well for my use (on a single machine). I haven't used the sync-option! Other reviews report it is buggy...
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15356034, hace un día
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por fabioescolastico, hace 2 díasAjuda muito quem precisa acessar vários de logins diferentes, mas a sincronia tem problemas.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por majesticmini, hace 7 díasIt was miraculous to use, but Mozilla does not care to develop or run anything without illegal corporations telling them what to do. Who agrees? Is the Internet not a conspiracy?
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13835821, hace 8 díasIrresponsible to have this extension published and available with such dire bugs. Whatever you do, DO NOT turn on Sync for this extension. You'll end up wiping out your entire configuration, your containers, your site rules, everything.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por DDB, hace 9 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14515734, hace 9 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por KurChr, hace 10 díasNeeded to have multiple Web Outlook email accounts open simultaneously. Worked great. If pinned the accounts came back up without logging in again if Firefox exited and restarted. Would be absolutely perfect for me if the accounts came back up after a Restart.
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Randomfox, hace 11 díasDoesn't work well containing Google, can't sign in on gemini.google.com
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19625591, hace 11 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por 0x666c697473, hace 13 díasGuaranteed to silently drop containers in the middle of your workflow, with no github interest in even acknowledging the problem.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por spindog, hace 14 díassyncing is pointless. i'm done setting up site lists every time it resets when logging in on new devices.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Davide, hace 14 díasThe Firefox Sync integration is horrible - it keeps merging back old changes. Container settings get reverted, and old removed containers come back...
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Sean Critz, hace 15 díasThis extension needs some work before it fits the concept. In situations where multiple accounts need to be managed on the same website (using multiple microsoft accounts for different clients, for instance) , it is generally not usable. The following workflow breaks it:
- Open tab in X container, login to a service
- Service uses redirects to authenticate, container extension grabs those redirects and loses the container status or changes the container status, breaking the login flow or putting a different login into the context
Additionally, there does not seem to be an option to remove a site from a container preference, once added. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por René, hace 15 díasDe ideale manier om met meerdere accounts en een domein te werken zonder van profiel te hoeven wisselen.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Steve S, hace 17 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14376762, hace 18 díasWorks well for seperating my tracked internet history, without needing to setup a second Firefox Profile & Mozilla Account. This in addition to the Facebook, Google & Twitter Containers help keep those 3 from tying everywhere I go on the 'net to my accounts.
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13252902, hace 22 díasReally helps at keeping some of the problematic sites contained. Could use some polishing but very useful addition.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por fazlan, hace 22 díasthis is the god extension for me. my life saver please continue. dont stop ever. i love you firefox
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Mackintosh´s, hace 23 díasPlease change environment bonds to Deep Links instead of only Top Level Domains. Ask whether the container should always open up when the current deep link is opened or whenever any site of the top level domain is opened.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Dan, hace 25 días
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por ChosenFate, hace un mesThis is great in concept, however, the friction kills it for me. After adding a site to a container, whenever I now open a link of that site, I get asked whether I wanna open it in that container. Of course I do, I mean, I manually added it to that container. This only needs to be done once per site, but it's still unnecessary friction that just about tips it over to "more pain than gain" unfortunately. Please make an option to always open a given site in it's container no matter what