Revisiones de NoScript
NoScript por Giorgio Maone
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 13504819
Se valoró con 3 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 13504819, hace 8 añosFirst of all thank you for all the effort you put into the new Quantum-enabled version of NoScript. I can imagine, it took a lot of time to rewrite this extension, which had been developed for years, completely from scratch.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
2422 revisiones
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14609268, hace 2 díasWhile this is an incredibly great app for granular control, it is the OPPOSITE of its "with no loss of functionality" mission. This is the #1 go-to source of browser errors that I am constantly troubleshooting and it takes HOURS of time sifting to figure out what to tweak because it provides no help when it breaks something (like a search box)--you just have to go on a lengthy trial and error quest one by one to figure out which of 30 sites to trust to get a search bar working and by that time I don't remember what I was going to search for. So you end up just globally trusting everything and that defeats the whole purpose.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13935566, hace 11 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Pompan, hace 14 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Beauleau, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Maximilien Perron, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18127040, hace un mesТакие прям зайки и лапочки... Разместить закрытие окна приветствия и "Пожертвовать" чуть ли не с наложением друг на друга. Эдакое "Ну, даааааайти деняяяяяях!". Звезда в минус.
Аддон классный, но не нужно быть, как эти. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Sunny, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19664008, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19487299, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ryan Steed, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por ZeroUnderscoreOu, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Dzluck, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Bob, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por mlatpren, hace 3 mesesIt does a great job at blocking, but is regularly frustrating with re-enabling things. It's supposed to show you what it's blocking, but that's extremely hit-or-miss. Occasionally, there'd be something blocked where the only solution is to disable the extension. As in, right-click and disable *from Firefox itself.*
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por zekromVale, hace 3 mesesThere needs to be a CPU limit on this extension, using 30% CPU of an intel i7 11th gen laptop CPU on YouTube is ridiculous. Firefox for Ubuntu snap, flatpack, or just .deb are affected. Must disable NoScript to fix it or allow everything fully for all domains on the page. I would like more domains to be added to the global trusted list though (by default) or have a popup at the top when you first visit a page.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Hopeavirta, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Lazy Cat, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por sumobunny, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Zelgadis-San, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Dadou, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por aq, hace 3 mesesUser for at least 15 years, Something is conflicting on Firefox. It is blocking scripts and other add ons such as tampermonkey or violentmonkey with scripts added, but without any listing of what is being blocked. Only option is to shut it off to proceed.
Even blocking games internal scripts without any 'monkey' in use.
Please check and test - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Simon Bünemann, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por ADKFZ8O, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Marw, hace 4 meses