Revisiones de NoScript
NoScript por Giorgio Maone
2360 revisiones
- Se valoró con 2 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13512313, hace 7 añosWhy does it suck so hard now? It was a good add-on and one of the reasons I use Firefox. Think i give Opera a chance.
Since 10.1.2 Temporarly button is back; it's getting better again. - Se valoró con 1 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13511675, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5by Nicholas Valentine, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5by JP, hace 7 añosWas having a lot of trouble with it at first. The noscript button was working for a bit, then stopped working which may have been due to a FF update as far as I could tell on the noscript site? Restarting the browser fixed that particular issue but other things weren't working.
I removed noscript from the add-ons and then went to https://noscript.net/getit and installed from there and it seems to have fixed a majority of the problems as well as cleaned up the UI a bit. I suggest everyone give that a try as well. Just seems there's still bugs to work out and I'm glad to continue to stick with it. - Se valoró con 5 de 5by Welker, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5by The Lieutenant, hace 7 añosThe extension is still great, but the new UI is absolutely horrible.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13510381, hace 7 añosUsed it for Years.
The new Version doesn't work properly.
UMatrix is an alternative. - Se valoró con 2 de 5by radiofree, hace 7 añosAlla fine ho deciso di fare un downgrade alla ultyima versione fi Firefox 56.
Con la v.10 di Noscipt , a parte della complicazione del nuovo menú, molte pagine non caricano correctamente incluso se si permette JavaScript globalmente. Chissa la nuova API non permette il ritorno all'interfaccia calssica?
Spero poter tornare ad usare Nocript prossimamente perche è chiaro che non sarà sicuro continuare con FF 56,02 a lungo.
Grazie comunque per i'ottima estensione che è stata fino a pochi gg fà. - Se valoró con 1 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13499217, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13509908, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13509901, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13509806, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13509796, hace 7 añosI understood the previous version of NoScript.
I do not understand this version. It is not clear what is going on, or what the icon colours mean. Red versus green seems to be disconnected from permitted and not permitted.
I need documentation. The alternative in the latest version of FireFox is uMatrix, which I have on one machine. It is Very Complicated, but I did find complete documentation for it.
To use NoScript 10.1.1 or later I must have documentation. - Se valoró con 3 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13509040, hace 7 años3 stars becauze of new Quantum firefox UI, before it it was just perfect, now it is just pure-brainfuck. I will welcome that weed which was smoked while making this nature-fatal-error UI. oh, and TOR still keeps old-fashined perfect UI <3
- Se valoró con 5 de 5by PET-FOX, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13508642, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13508459, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 12674645, hace 7 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13508328, hace 7 añosI am still on FF 56 and generally happy with NoScript. After checking the FF57 status and reading what others wrote I felt compelled to do two things. First, I sent a complaint to Mozilla directly - not just about NoScript, but the whole debacle that the move to webextenions has become. They knew this would happen and let the train wreck continue any way.
Second, I am really disappointed at the vitriol directed at this developer. Most, if not all, of the blame is with Mozilla and that is where you should be directing your anger. Things that could be done pre 57 are no longer either a) allowed or b) possible or c) both.
I don't doubt that he is disappointed and angry too. One of the, if not the, most poplular extensions for years, and now kicked to the curb through little fault of his own. I'm sure he will continue to try to make it better but what is 'better' in 57+ will not ever be the same as the older versions. - Se valoró con 4 de 5by Reindl Harald, hace 7 añosthe android version don't block anything on FF57 and the UI on the desktop has ugly scrollbars here
- Se valoró con 4 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13507805, hace 7 añosThe old version was amazing, truly a power user's addon. The new version... well I understand that you had to rush a complete redesign and rewrite... but it's too bad that it lost a lot of functionality. On the up-side, I do like the new interface.
In particular I'd like to point out that the addon does not work in Private Browsing mode. Would it be possible to add back the Temporary Permissions feature and allow people to "Temporarily Allow" URL's for the duration of Private Browsing sessions? - Se valoró con 2 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13507402, hace 7 añosNew addon for Firefox Quantum is bad. Why is log.js open always. I always get 1.000 notification on console and it takes more CPU usage. New interface is worse than old one. I can't understand which domain is blocked or allowed.
I want old interface an system back. If you can't do same. Do it similar. Or work with good interface designer. I don't want to delete this add-on.
I hope you can fix all problems soon. - Se valoró con 5 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13507298, hace 7 añosVery useful extension. Happy to see the developer listened to our feedback.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5by Usuario de Firefox 13507242, hace 7 añosHey guys, even the new gui is not comfortable as it used to be and so on...please consider this as a free addon and how much time is needed to update it concerning the new quantum firefox code - just give it some time and a fair chance instead of bashing around - giorgio, please go on with your good work, so we can all benefit from noscript again