Revisiones de Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube)
Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube) por code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
Revisado por Wagner
Se valoró con 1 de 5
por Wagner, hace un añode fato nenhum supera o falecido youtube enhancer... esse até tinha boa proposta e algumas opções apesar de bem cru, mas o mais importante não cumpriu, que é bloquear o lixo cibernético (refiro a propagandas)
776 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Yevhen Tretiakov, hace 2 horas
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por stapuft, hace 5 díasWorks allright, but on mobile, you have tonswitch to "desktop mode" to make some features work, like automatically redirecting from the shitty "shorts" page to the actual YouTube page for the video.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 11 horasHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will.
This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering).
The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here.) - Se valoró con 5 de 5por PP, hace 7 díasSeems to work for me. Haven't come across any issues for my uses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Lakyn, hace 8 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por MetalGear89, hace 8 díasFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19465923, hace 12 díasThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 11 horashi! youtube changing is not an issue we share every day. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18989911, hace 12 días
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por TS, hace 15 díasIt's very hit or miss if any of its features actually work on mobile. The interface is trash and the prevent autoplay toggle blocks the video from loading entirely.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 11 horashi! This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15037318, hace 16 díasIt does not even allow me to watch youtube videos after I had installed it!
Test it before making it available! - Se valoró con 3 de 5por ueeu, hace 16 díasVery good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UIRespuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 11 horasYou mean full replacement UI?
There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Vangxim, hace 19 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por SzymonL, hace 19 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17491097, hace 20 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Cboom, hace 22 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ivia Relle, hace 22 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Hoàng Hải Hậu, hace 24 días
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16779275, hace 25 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por coldcoffee, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por DOT, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19242234, hace un mesThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 23 díasHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We can also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).