Arviot lisäosalle NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite tekijä Giorgio Maone
Käyttäjän Michael Rabinovsky kirjoittama arvio
Arvioitu 2/5
kirjoittanut Michael Rabinovsky, viisi kuukautta sittenNo Script is an incredibly useful add-on. In the past, I'd have given it five stars; it now gets only two (see issues below). All in all, I'd say it's still better to have it than not, but that's only because there is no better alternative, and there is no difference between having to completely disable it on a page versus not having it at all.
First of all, it would have gotten three due to the issues I list further down, but it gets two because of a major functionality problem that makes it obnoxious to use, and by its admission, not private in private windows.
In the past, when you set it to trust top-level domains, it would automatically set them to temp trusted; however, for whatever reason, it now sets them to "custom," for me, which functions the same as untrusted, and changing it doesn't even refresh the page for you.
The default setting handling is a huge inconvenience, but that is not where the problems end. You cannot restore previous functionality by manually setting the top-level domain to temp trust. To enable scripts on the page, you must set it to trust, which makes it permanently trusted, and keeps a log of every page you visit in private windows. If you try to change it to temp trust and refresh the page, it goes back to "custom."
Besides that, the description for the extension is outdated. Not only does it still mention Flash, but it also claims no loss of functionality when you need it, which is not true. In most cases, enabling some scripts will return the functionality you need, but there are several reasons why that's not always the case.
Sometimes, certain scripts you need will be on sub-domains of the top-level domain, and they need to be enabled separately; however, NoScript doesn't show them because it thinks they are part of the main domain, so you have no way to make the site work without completely disabling the addon for the page.
In other instances, sites won't load all the scripts until they load some other domains. For example, a CDN containing vital scripts might not appear on the list because it's called after an analytics script has run. There is no way to know that unless you enable each script on the list, one by one. The domain doesn't need to be related; it's just something about how the page loads.
First of all, it would have gotten three due to the issues I list further down, but it gets two because of a major functionality problem that makes it obnoxious to use, and by its admission, not private in private windows.
In the past, when you set it to trust top-level domains, it would automatically set them to temp trusted; however, for whatever reason, it now sets them to "custom," for me, which functions the same as untrusted, and changing it doesn't even refresh the page for you.
The default setting handling is a huge inconvenience, but that is not where the problems end. You cannot restore previous functionality by manually setting the top-level domain to temp trust. To enable scripts on the page, you must set it to trust, which makes it permanently trusted, and keeps a log of every page you visit in private windows. If you try to change it to temp trust and refresh the page, it goes back to "custom."
Besides that, the description for the extension is outdated. Not only does it still mention Flash, but it also claims no loss of functionality when you need it, which is not true. In most cases, enabling some scripts will return the functionality you need, but there are several reasons why that's not always the case.
Sometimes, certain scripts you need will be on sub-domains of the top-level domain, and they need to be enabled separately; however, NoScript doesn't show them because it thinks they are part of the main domain, so you have no way to make the site work without completely disabling the addon for the page.
In other instances, sites won't load all the scripts until they load some other domains. For example, a CDN containing vital scripts might not appear on the list because it's called after an analytics script has run. There is no way to know that unless you enable each script on the list, one by one. The domain doesn't need to be related; it's just something about how the page loads.
2 419 arviota
- Arvioitu 4/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 18127040, tunti sittenТакие прям зайки и лапочки... Разместить закрытие окна приветствия и "Пожертвовать" чуть ли не с наложением друг на друга. Эдакое "Ну, даааааайти деняяяяяях!". Звезда в минус.
Аддон классный, но не нужно быть, как эти. - Arvioitu 4/5kirjoittanut MinorityMaid, kaksi tuntia sittenIt's extremely useful, but not exactly intuitive.
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Sunny, päivä sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19664008, 10 päivää sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19487299, 12 päivää sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Ryan Steed, 22 päivää sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut ZeroUnderscoreOu, kuukausi sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut 鼎针皮艺, kuukausi sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Bob, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut mlatpren, kaksi kuukautta sittenIt does a great job at blocking, but is regularly frustrating with re-enabling things. It's supposed to show you what it's blocking, but that's extremely hit-or-miss. Occasionally, there'd be something blocked where the only solution is to disable the extension. As in, right-click and disable *from Firefox itself.*
- Arvioitu 3/5kirjoittanut zekromVale, kaksi kuukautta sittenThere needs to be a CPU limit on this extension, using 30% CPU of an intel i7 11th gen laptop CPU on YouTube is ridiculous. Firefox for Ubuntu snap, flatpack, or just .deb are affected. Must disable NoScript to fix it or allow everything fully for all domains on the page. I would like more domains to be added to the global trusted list though (by default) or have a popup at the top when you first visit a page.
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Hopeavirta, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Lazy Cat, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut sumobunny, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Zelgadis-San, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Dadou, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 3/5kirjoittanut aq, kaksi kuukautta sittenUser for at least 15 years, Something is conflicting on Firefox. It is blocking scripts and other add ons such as tampermonkey or violentmonkey with scripts added, but without any listing of what is being blocked. Only option is to shut it off to proceed.
Even blocking games internal scripts without any 'monkey' in use.
Please check and test - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Simon Bünemann, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut ADKFZ8O, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Marw, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 2/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 15990777, kolme kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Arman Daneshjoo, kolme kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut elmika, neljä kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19469020, neljä kuukautta sitten