Arviot lisäosalle Tampermonkey
Tampermonkey tekijä Jan Biniok
4 550 arviota
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 12986804, yhdeksän vuotta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 12928384, yhdeksän vuotta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 10247748, yhdeksän vuotta sittenYes, it is nice to have a future-proof script manager, but sadly even 4.3.5410beta do not work on latest firefox 55 (blank popup, no scripts are loaded).
I am using newest win32 inbound nightly from here https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/tinderbox-builds/mozilla-inbound-win32-pgo
Edit: Still don't work 2017-03-29 inbound PGO Nightly 55.0a1.
Edit2: Already tried a new profile. No success. You have downloaded the wrong nightly. There is a difference between 'inbound' nightly and nightly. Inbound gets even faster and newer features before normal 'central' gets them.
Also be sure to use PGO version, which is still different compiled. So... just use my link.
Edit3: Scratch that, the culprit is adding
'general.useragent.override' with value 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0");'
pretending using next official release on Win7 (reality: Win10). After that tampermonkey do not work.Kehittäjän vastaus
lähetetty yhdeksän vuotta sittenThere currently is a Tampermonkey update in the review queue, but it might take some time until the review gets finished. (https://github.com/Tampermonkey/tampermonkey/issues/352#issuecomment-285466789)
Nightly and developer version users can use this unofficial release in the meantime: https://tampermonkey.net/xpi/46544b6d654f61/firefox-5410beta.xpi
Edit: 5410beta is working fine here with Nightly 55.0a1 (2017-03-23) (64-bit) , Developer Edition 54.0a2 (2017-03-23) (64-bit).
Edit: ... and 55.0a1 (2017-03-29) (32-Bit) from here: https://download-installer.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-central/firefox-55.0a1.en-US.win32.installer.exe
I just installed this and Tampermonkey and everything is working fine. Can you please create a new temporary Firefox profile and check whether it's working there? - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Fred Thompson, yhdeksän vuotta sittenWorks? Yes.
Nice interface? Yes, especially sorting.
Why is Tampermonkey so large? It's almost 3 times larger than GreaseMonkey in Firefox and almost 4 times larger than Violent Monkey in Chrome.
I really like the userscript list but if that's the only real difference, it's not work 600k of code.
Please enlighten me.
--
ok, I see now. The size comes from the JavaScript editor and the UI. Would you consider splitting TamperMonkey into 2 versions; developer and run-only?Kehittäjän vastaus
lähetetty yhdeksän vuotta sittenSizes of extracted extension components:
12K ./vendor/saveas # SaveAs lib
68K ./vendor/zip_js # ZipJS lib
472K ./vendor/jshint # JSHint
492K ./vendor/cm # CodeMirror Editor + plugins
84K ./vendor/jquery.js
1.2M ./vendor # all vendor components
388K ./main # Tampermonkey main code
24K ./rea # Browser dependent code
624K ./_locales # i18n
120K ./layout/default/fonts # UI font
208K ./layout/default/images # UI images
496K ./layout/default # UI font+images+code
140K ./images # General Tampermonkey images (action menu (5 different resolutions), extension page, ...) - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut gggggcm, yhdeksän vuotta sittenWell it makes surfing Internet more convinient
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut dLeon, yhdeksän vuotta sitten* Support 3 major browsers.
This alone already big star for me.
As relatively new comer in userscripts manager, instead rely on old big bricks it based on newer one. Future improvements surely expected. - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 12604003, yhdeksän vuotta sittenAlmost as good as greasemonkey was when playing Kingdoms of Camelot from KABAM. If you want to use scripts try this.
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Miguel Angel, yhdeksän vuotta sittenA comparacion de otras aplicaciones, esta es la que me ha dado buenos resultados.
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 12465568, yhdeksän vuotta sitten5 Estrelas para apoiar o desenvolvimento!
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 12367847, yhdeksän vuotta sittenKeep up the good work 5 *****
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Muhammad Anwari Ramadhan, yhdeksän vuotta sittenthats work on version 46, but i don't know why when i reinstall after upgrade firefox to version 47. thats error ocured.
msg 'error filesize' - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut mkdante381, 10 vuotta sittenI can't install 4.1.5240 on Firefox 47. Old work in 100% but icon sometime is hidden
Kehittäjän vastaus
lähetetty 10 vuotta sittenI've created a bug report for this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1274649 - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Lestalia, 10 vuotta sittenWhen trying to load local scripts with @require, which works perfectly in Opera. Any idea on how to work that out in Firefox Nightly.
update: Will do. Thank you.Kehittäjän vastaus
lähetetty 10 vuotta sittenUnfortunately local file access is not implemented (yet), but you can vote for this issue:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1246236 - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut HardKoreG, 10 vuotta sittenThe newest version shrinks the text on some websites, including this one. I disable Tampermonkey and the text goes back to normal. It also affect gmail and a couple other sites I've come across. Also, the text from the toolbar button menu is huge. Could you make it smaller?
Edit: The shrinking text and menu text is normal. Thanks. The menu items don't seem to fit the window. I have to scroll to the right to see the whole name of the script. Could you make the window large enough to fit horizontally? Vertical scrolling is fine. Not a big deal, just a minor nuisance. This is what it looks like: http://i.imgur.com/PwglEhk.pngKehittäjän vastaus
lähetetty 10 vuotta sittenTampermonkey was updated today. Sorry for any inconvenience.
Is the button menu text sized in a normal way now?
Edit: The menu should be sized correctly once issue 1215025 [1] is fixed. At the moment a minimum size is set to make the menu usable for now, but it can't be too large to not overwrite the correct size at later FF releases.
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215025