SBAHJifier tekijä Isaiah Odhner

Make any page look like SWEET BRO AND HELLA JEFF.

5 (3 reviews)

98 käyttäjää

Tarvitset Firefoxin käyttääksesi tätä laajennusta

Lataa Firefox ja hanki laajennus

Lataa tiedosto

Tietoja tästä laajennuksesta

Dave: Combine brain and SBaHJ drawing and chrome extension.
(relevant comic page)

Make any website look like a sweet bro and hella jeff comic with the press of a button. THAT IS A GOOD THING.

Webpages being too slow? Probably because they're NOT TRYING TO COMPUTE ENOUGH FILTERS!

Click the button multiple times to make the page worse and worse!

Features:

Injects sbahj related images into the page
Replaces some images similarly
Adds other things......... like ellipses..... dot dot dot.............
Removes much superfluous, uncalled-for, and undesirable quality
Spells things wrong, automaticaly!
Typography nerds fear not, as it uses only Comic Sans.
Replaces headings with much stupid ugly geometry (like the image at the very top of the sbahj comics)
...Is that Geromy?

Open source on GitHub (MIT licensed)
Also available on the Chrome Web Store

Todo:

Options??
Moaar animated gifs
Bro-speakize the text instead of just misspelling it, maybe? nah

I am not affiliated with http://www.mspaintadventures.com/sweetbroandhellajeff/
Sweet Bro and Hella Jeff, the icon, etc. are probably copyright of Andrew Hussie.

Rated 5 by 3 reviewers

Version 1.1.3 julkaisutiedot

- Also apply misspellings to generated graphic headings/buttons. Only things that were originally images are safe from typos now!
- Fix google search result page sometimes going blank when triggering the extension, due to `<noscript>` content becoming active. (Only sometimes because it would apply misspellings to the content before adding it to the page as HTML so the `<style>` tag they had (that makes most stuff invisible)'s rules didn't usually apply (since they'd be spelled wrong.))
- Avoid dynamic HTML everywhere (even tho the rest of the cases should have been safe)
- Show error in popup unless the script injection is definitely successful (previously it would think it was successful on browser builtin pages such as about:addons)