Critiques pour CanvasBlocker
CanvasBlocker par kkapsner
365 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par JanKKM, il y a 7 ansThe addon works perfectly. I tested all extensions for blocking canvas and this one definitely does the best job.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14244108 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14307734 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansHello, excellent program, for when a version for the Opera browser ??????
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansA version for Opera or Chrome is not planned. They do not provide the necessary APIs to provide the same quality of protection. - Noté 5 sur 5par Darsh229, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14300424 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansIt gets the job done.
Didn't even know I need it until a web page started to abuse canvas to shove ads in your face - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14097838 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansA must have privacy extension for everyone!
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14242164 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansGreat stuff. I think this should be a "featured extension" in the pivacy and security category.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14054127 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansNice, but the toolbar icon changes color sometimes (red/green). What do the different colors mean?
Green = I'm save, red = I'm not protected? And what do I have to do for it to protect me again?Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansThe color change just indicate that something was faked. It's some sort of notification and nothing to worry about. - Noté 5 sur 5par Detergent, il y a 7 ansI tested this addon with the Panopticlick test from the EFF, and when I check the 'full results' it shows that the hash values are changed every time I have the addon enabled. So I guess it's basically ruining it for people who use these values to track you.
- Noté 5 sur 5par kondor, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par samyueru_beityosef_benmayumi, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Fleet Command, il y a 7 ansIt is great, but it'd be much better if the Mozilla Add-ons link embedded in it was language-agnostic. Currently, it is to the German version of the site.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansThis issue will be fixed in the next version: https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues/219 - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14201700 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14191840 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par pix0wl, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12654054 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansExcellent add-on! Thanks for your hard work!
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14191652 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansVery nice works.
But it may not pass detective on test page http://101.37.204.139:8080/uapost.html.when try times test, it may enter an endless loop and Let the browser stop working.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansThis page doen't even work when no addon at all is installed... but to discuss this further please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues
Communication is much easier there. - Noté 5 sur 5par zhaqenl, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13202285 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par The Beard Below My Chin, il y a 7 ansNice works.
Please note I test the audio fingerprint at https://audiofingerprint.openwpm.com/ and it causes browser slowdown.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansI know - this page is not written in a peformant way. You can test the audio fingerprint at http://kkapsner.github.io/CanvasBlocker/test/audioTest.html as well. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14156124 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansNice works.
Please note it does not detect (and block) the code embedded in a url through the
"data:text/html" directive.
I don't know if this method it's exploitable in a web page
example: paste the following code on your navigation bar
(It's a dots wave single pixel plotter, so it uses getImageData and it works even if you block the readout API):
edit: sample code moved to pastebin (sorry, pasting the code here does not works):
https://pastebin.com/pFvdgKNNRéponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansGood point. I will see if this is exploitable. But please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can discuss the implications and findings. Also communication is much easier there. - Noté 5 sur 5par GregDT, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13835690 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansThank you for this extension (and for keeping it opensource). Nowadays it's getting harder and harder to get a sense of real privacy. CanvasBlocker + AdGuard for Windows + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + custom user.js helps me feel safer on a growing data collection frenzy.
- Noté 5 sur 5par ©®°˜, il y a 7 ans100% unique mean that is not really natural, canvas should not be unique but changed in order to be natural.
Unique canvas fingerprints will do much worse.
Is like you said you have a device that never exist.
To better understand how this work :
Google already have a full database with all kind of canvas signatures from all worldwide devices (iphone, android, computers, etc...), and if your canvas signature will not match on them database then you fail, it is a prove that your canvas is fake. If you try to spoof the signature then image pixel parameters will not match and again you fail so is almoust imposible to pass canvas.
On default settings may make it pass the google test.
For example google will not ask for SMS confirmation when a new gmail account is created because he trust the device you use.
Most of people must understand why unique signatures is bad practice and all softwares that spoof parameters will make traking services to detect the device much easyRéponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansPlease open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can discuss this. AMOs rating comments are too limited to have a good conversation.
One small comment on unique signatures: they are not bad by itself as long as they are not persistend (i.e. the timestamp you connect to the server is very likely to be a unique signature but it's not persistent). This is the case in the CB default settings.