Critiques pour Dark Reader
Dark Reader par Dark Reader Ltd
6 683 notes
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18513566 de Firefox, il y a un an4 out of 5. It works great on most websites, but breaks Wikipedia, even when using Wikipedia's native dark mode without the extension converting the page to dark. When viewing Wikipedia pages in Firefox with Dark Reader enabled as an extension (but not running on the page), images on Wikipedia do not close and stay open across other Wikipedia urls.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18750710 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18749987 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par paladont, il y a un anThere is no extension better for dark mode than Dark Reader. Thank you for your continued updates!
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18749783 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Alfix, il y a un anIt cost money. I can belive that so many users use this addon if you can just look in the websites setting for 1 min. Bad product. 1/5 :(
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13691919 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15711806 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18744764 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Thorn, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par ballism32, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Highness Emperor, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Forest Floor Vacuumer, il y a un anHave had a really nice experience using Dark Reader. Have it on all my browsers (FireFox, Brave, Safari + Mobile). Super useful, and love how it's possible to customise which websites it's on for or off for or in Light or Dark mode for. Controls on Safari are a bit different and doesn't seem to work as successfully (sometimes the text box elements get darkened out completely while background remains seipia, for example), but honestly I suspect the problem lies more with Safari than the extention. While it's free, I've paid for it both on mobile and computer. I think it's worth the money, especially with the stupid levels of time I have to stare at a computer screen.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14463784 de Firefox, il y a un anJust what my eyes needed
- Noté 5 sur 5par ibrahim, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par bankE46, il y a un anAmazing extension that I've used for years. Fast updates and generally high compatibility across thousands of sites. Thanks for your hard work - just contributed to your project.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18742281 de Firefox, il y a un antwitch neustále hlasí chybu doplnku že ho zpomaluje
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18466764 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Paras, il y a un an
- Noté 4 sur 5par Anton D, il y a un anwell it's good in general but far from ideal. For corporate sites it's a must-have: its filter mode is often better than the corporate "Dark" mode even if it exists.
I miss a method to disable or alter modes based on the full URL instead of domain (this will immensely help for plaintext in particular).
Also it doesn't invert PDFs.
Three things annoy me about it: the slowness of the dynamic modes, failure of Filter mode to display plaintext files readably (they show them as an black text on an almost-black background), and inability to crate full-page screenshots with Filter modes (the part of the page which isn't displayed at the time of the screenshot doesn't have the inverted colours). This all annoys me far less than the white-background sites, like addons.mozilla.org (and there are others too which somehow avoid being inverted while not being protected), but that's not the add-on failure, partly because I can swiftly mitigate the add-on troubles using hotkeys.