Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
2 457 notes
- Noté 4 sur 5par progan01, il y a 6 ansUp until Firefox 79, NoScript was an indispensable part of my security suite, handling intrusions and trouble scripts very well. But now either Firefox or NoScript does not remember my instructions from one session to the next, forcing me to re-approve privileges each time I revisit a site. I don't know why this is happening, but it's an enormous hindrance and a great timesuck. Can you look into this for me, Giorgio? Your product has been a Godsend to me, and I want to continue using it.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 6 ansIt's most likely this CCleaner bug: https://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - Noté 5 sur 5par Zitronella, il y a 6 ansNoScript works perfect also on firefox 79.0
If it doesn't remember settings the reason could be CCleaner > Custom Clean > Applications > Firefox > “Internet Cache” option deletes all *.sqlite-shm, *.sqlite-wal,
see
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/07/09/changes-to-storage-sync-in-firefox-79/#comment-226931
That’s a bug in CCleaner, not in NoScript and not in Firefox.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 6 anshttps://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - Noté 5 sur 5par nenas1ya, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16136545 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16103032 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15819827 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Jaga, il y a 6 ansWorks perfectly on all websites used. All pages loads slower than usual time.
- Noté 4 sur 5par singh, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par smluuvslm, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Pieta, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par gep23, il y a 6 ansOne of my best ratings. Recently, however, the permissions are no longer saved and I have to reassign them almost every session.
- Noté 5 sur 5par user 735972, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par theone, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14601750 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Татьяна, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par visika, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Dragganot33, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par MSpan, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par GT, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Andralon, il y a 6 ansa script that is marked "trusted" on one page, is also trusted on every other page, which is the same as "trusted globally".
if "disable restrictions globally (dangerous)" is
"dangerous" (in the programmers opinion), why is the "trusted" not bound to the specific page?
- page A does work without script X
- page B doesn't work without script X
(e.g. doubleclick, googleanalytics, googlestatics)
why would i want to allow script X on page A? - Noté 5 sur 5par Fox the Apprentice, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Thekoshin, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16087053 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansA fairly useful addon that can prevent sketchy sites from doing sketchy things. Now, most websites won't show images unless you enable JS for a few things, and some won't even allow you to use it unless Java Script is enabled, but for the most part, as long as you use it right, it would greatly help prevent sketchy scripts