Critiques pour Web Archives
Web Archives par Armin Sebastian
Avis de KirkH420
Noté 4 sur 5
par KirkH420, il y a 4 ansIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
333 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par ilovemikael, il y a 5 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Jatila, il y a 8 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par GnarlyCmdr, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19720321 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dan, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17451381 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Jalewood, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15958710 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Java, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19611278 de Firefox, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19604848 de Firefox, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par أبوعلي, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Ugarov, il y a 6 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18960744 de Firefox, il y a 6 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Deo, il y a 7 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Kaqxar, il y a 7 moisAlas it breaks login pages which use Cloudflare captcha!
I first thought that uBO and/or Privacy Badger are the culprit and disabled those, but then still could reliably reproduce the bug. Then I disabled *ALL* my extensions and enabled them one by one, meanwhile testing logging in. When I turned on Web Archives, login stopped working, I got an error message after entering my credentials and clicking the "I am a human" checkbox on the popup Cloudflare captcha.
Once I disabled Web Archives, login started to work again.
Mind you, this test was done with uBO and PB still being disabled.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 moisI don't see how this extension could break your login page, but if you'd open an issue on GitHub, we could debug the problem together by testing the same login page.
https://github.com/dessant/web-archives/issues - Noté 4 sur 5par dost, il y a 7 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par frostbyte, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19173586 de Firefox, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19114790 de Firefox, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18905802 de Firefox, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19145735 de Firefox, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19128233 de Firefox, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par casi dancasy, il y a 8 mois