Critiques pour Image Max URL
Image Max URL par qsniyg
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14986384 de Firefox
Noté 1 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14986384 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansThis hasn't been working properly for many months now. It will give me the image I am currently hovering, in the same size as it appears, instead of showing the biggest available size. Many times I've found that simply googling the name of the image I want (often times album art) will yield me the full size while this addon doesn't. There can even be several copies of the same image in the google result, all in different dimensions, and this extension will only give me the dimension of whichever image I use it on, as opposed to the biggest.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansCorrect, this extension does not perform a reverse image search (I should clarify that in the addon's description).
The goal of this addon is to find larger images that the _website_ provides, many of which are otherwise inaccessible (i.e. the website doesn't link to the larger images, even though they exist). The addon isn't meant to replace a reverse image search engine, but rather to be used as a tool in conjunction with one, since the images linked by a reverse image search often aren't as large as they could be.
To address your specific situation, if you were to try to view album art on a blog, this addon would probably not yield a much larger image, unless the blog author uploaded a larger image to their blog (and linked a scaled-down one).
However, if you were to go on the iTunes website and use the addon on album art there, you'd likely find a much larger image than what's on the website, because iTunes does store very high-definition images on their server (which aren't by default available on their website).
I hope this answers your question. If not, please let me know :) (you can use the Github issue tracker or Discord)
The goal of this addon is to find larger images that the _website_ provides, many of which are otherwise inaccessible (i.e. the website doesn't link to the larger images, even though they exist). The addon isn't meant to replace a reverse image search engine, but rather to be used as a tool in conjunction with one, since the images linked by a reverse image search often aren't as large as they could be.
To address your specific situation, if you were to try to view album art on a blog, this addon would probably not yield a much larger image, unless the blog author uploaded a larger image to their blog (and linked a scaled-down one).
However, if you were to go on the iTunes website and use the addon on album art there, you'd likely find a much larger image than what's on the website, because iTunes does store very high-definition images on their server (which aren't by default available on their website).
I hope this answers your question. If not, please let me know :) (you can use the Github issue tracker or Discord)
119 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par safeAnonym, il y a 9 heures
- Noté 5 sur 5par max, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par HellPhantom, il y a 13 joursMy Goal is to get larger and better images of what I already have/see.
Now that Google reverse image lookup is no more this add-on is the best. I use it first to find larger/Better image. Even when it fails I can then use "Search by image" add-on, on what it did find to either search Google lens or TinyEye and about 10 other reverse lookup engines. Its not as convenient as google reverse lookup add-on I had but I believe I might actually be getting to what I want faster now. Not in steps but in results found. 60+% of time I find it in first step not needing "Search by image" add-on. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14571061 de Firefox, il y a 15 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par Guimauve, il y a 23 joursHello, I just discovered this extension and I find it much better than Imagus. Thank you to the developer! However, I have a problem with Google Images: IMU 2025.12.0 works fine with the first 100 thumbnails on the page, but beyond that, IMU no longer displays the image in full size, but only the thumbnails.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 19 joursGoogle Images recently updated, and the previous technique to find the original images past 100 (the preloaded amount) doesn't work anymore. I've implemented a fix for the userscript version, but unfortunately getting this to work on the extension version is a bit trickier, and might not land in the next release (it needs to intercept HTTP calls, which is definitely my least favorite approach towards supporting a website).
I've tracked the feature here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/1533 . Note that once it's implemented, you will need to enable "Rules intercepting HTTP requests" (under the Rules tab). It's disabled by default because it carries a fingerprinting risk. - Noté 5 sur 5par https://www.youtube.com/@digitalartist2D, il y a un mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par malau, il y a un moisIt doesn't really work at all. I'm not sure what it does ? Maybe it is an info stealer ? Or malware ?
Using Reverse Image search ion YANDEX is infinitely better,Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a un moisSorry, this is a bit of a long response, but I'd like to address to your concerns.
To address the info stealing/malware concern, the script is 100% open source ( https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl ), and does *not* collect any kind of data about you. As part of being in the "Recommended extensions" program, Mozilla thoroughly audits these addons, and has actually requested a few changes in the past (that were implemented) in order for the script to be even more transparent to its users.
Regarding how it works, this addon finds larger images present *within* a website. Many websites will store an original full-sized image, but instead link to a smaller/scaled down version of the image. This is what the (currently) ~5800 rules do, as each website will often have their own systems to resize images.
It doesn't replace using a reverse image search, but rather complements using one. I personally regularly use both a reverse image search engine (such as Yandex, as you mentioned) alongside this addon, and have found that reverse image search engines often link to scaled down images that this addon finds a larger version of present on the website.
I would recommend enabling the "Enable redirection" (under the Redirection tab) and the "Rules using API calls" (under the Rules) tab. These options are disabled by default for users' privacy as they must perform HTTP requests to find the larger image, but they will help by (respectively): #1 Automatically redirecting images opened in their own tabs to the larger versions stored on the same site (if applicable), and #2 Supporting ~20% more websites, which require website-specific API calls to find the larger version (e.g. Flickr).
If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out using any of the communication methods at the bottom of the addon's description (discord/email/github etc.) :) - Noté 5 sur 5par Siegfried Witting, il y a un moisGreat stuff, Found this thing using Grok of all things lol as was looking for a way to download images off Deviant art in higher quality and it delivers!
- Noté 5 sur 5par Kiwi18, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18285487 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Xen, il y a 4 moisUseful to extract large version of images from some inconvenient sites
- Noté 5 sur 5par WOANS, il y a 5 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par youussef, il y a 6 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par space, il y a 7 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18719010 de Firefox, il y a 8 moisExtremely useful for downloading full sized images from albums. For example, an entire image album can be downloaded from Patreon at once without accidentally downloading anything else.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Sawyer, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par RobertHeadley, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par hkpd, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18777894 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17219221 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16870710 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par rtran015, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16927628 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17602617 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans