Critiques pour IPvFoo
IPvFoo par Paul Marks
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14049879 de Firefox
Noté 1 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14049879 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansDoes not work on my system: In the column where the ip should appear, there it says only "access denied".
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
40 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par vertigont17, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Wolf786, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Tempdirz, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17087931 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18373085 de Firefox, il y a un anexactly what I was looking for... Thanks!
- Noté 5 sur 5par tux, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Tim, il y a 2 ansFor those worried about "Access your data for all websites", this is an unavoidable problem with addon permission scopes. Put by the purported (likely?) author on a forum:
> IPvFoo author here. The problem is that there's no way to obtain the (hostname, ip) stream from Chrome/Firefox without requesting the "all websites" permission.
> In theory, browser vendors could define a narrowly-scoped permission that only reports (hostname, ip), or roll this functionality into the browser UI, but neither seems likely to happen.
> I made IPvFoo to promote IPv6 adoption, and wouldn't consider selling it for less than $10M USD. It probably won't ever be worth that much because it's an easily-cloned utility without a "moat", but it's more rational to set a price than refuse to sell under any circumstances.
The addon is open source, and if you insisted, could be built/installed manually. However, I trust it for now from here on AMO.
UPDATE: Thanks for confirming, Paul!Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 ans> purported (likely?) author
Yes, that was me (p1mrx on HN) - Noté 5 sur 5par Sharky, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par 葉稔, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Baptiste, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Caliban, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Rodolfo R@mírez..., il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par gomers., il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16855318 de Firefox, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par takeshi0303, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13845156 de Firefox, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16393218 de Firefox, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Abdul Rauf, il y a 5 ansThis should be the recommended extension by firefox. Source code is available at https://github.com/pmarks-net/ipvfoo so I think this can be trusted after review
- Noté 5 sur 5par somnitek, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par hbermon, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Marcone C.A, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par 章灵北, il y a 6 ansThanks！a VERY perfect extension to view whether the website give priority to IPV6.