Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
Avis de Daniel Saner
Noté 4 sur 5
par Daniel Saner, il y a 8 ansTo all the people complaining about the new UI (not that I expect any of them to see this): Giorgio can't revert back to the old UI because that kind of UI is no longer supported on Firefox 57 and above. Nice things like native drop-down menus and dialog boxes are no longer allowed. Those were part of XUL addons. Now we only have WebExtensions add-ons à la Chrome, and if you know Chrome, you know that its add-on interface situation is the same. "Nice" UIs have been prohibited by Mozilla, on purpose, so your gripe is with them, not with Giorgio, the developer of this add-on.
I do agree that the UI could use some work anyway, though, in terms of understandability, ease of use, and looks. But this is still an early version which had to be released in a rush, so give it a while.
I'll still deduct one star from my previous rating because too much comfort functionality is missing at the moment. Temporary exceptions, selective and site-wide, were one of my most-used features of NoScript, and they're not in yet. Also, the options screen is severely lacking, a lot of the behaviour I used to customise can't be changed right now. I assume that all of these things are still possible, and just haven't been implemented yet. Part of that blame, once again, can be put on Mozilla for their hasty and clumsy shutdown of XUL extensions and the rushed und grossly unfinished transition to WebExtensions, which is making life hard for all add-on developers.
I do agree that the UI could use some work anyway, though, in terms of understandability, ease of use, and looks. But this is still an early version which had to be released in a rush, so give it a while.
I'll still deduct one star from my previous rating because too much comfort functionality is missing at the moment. Temporary exceptions, selective and site-wide, were one of my most-used features of NoScript, and they're not in yet. Also, the options screen is severely lacking, a lot of the behaviour I used to customise can't be changed right now. I assume that all of these things are still possible, and just haven't been implemented yet. Part of that blame, once again, can be put on Mozilla for their hasty and clumsy shutdown of XUL extensions and the rushed und grossly unfinished transition to WebExtensions, which is making life hard for all add-on developers.
2 422 notes
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14609268 de Firefox, il y a 9 joursWhile this is an incredibly great app for granular control, it is the OPPOSITE of its "with no loss of functionality" mission. This is the #1 go-to source of browser errors that I am constantly troubleshooting and it takes HOURS of time sifting to figure out what to tweak because it provides no help when it breaks something (like a search box)--you just have to go on a lengthy trial and error quest one by one to figure out which of 30 sites to trust to get a search bar working and by that time I don't remember what I was going to search for. So you end up just globally trusting everything and that defeats the whole purpose.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13935566 de Firefox, il y a 18 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Pompan, il y a 21 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Beauleau, il y a un mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Maximilien Perron, il y a un mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18127040 de Firefox, il y a 2 moisТакие прям зайки и лапочки... Разместить закрытие окна приветствия и "Пожертвовать" чуть ли не с наложением друг на друга. Эдакое "Ну, даааааайти деняяяяяях!". Звезда в минус.
Аддон классный, но не нужно быть, как эти. - Noté 5 sur 5par Sunny, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19664008 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19487299 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ryan Steed, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par ZeroUnderscoreOu, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dzluck, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Bob, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par mlatpren, il y a 3 moisIt does a great job at blocking, but is regularly frustrating with re-enabling things. It's supposed to show you what it's blocking, but that's extremely hit-or-miss. Occasionally, there'd be something blocked where the only solution is to disable the extension. As in, right-click and disable *from Firefox itself.*
- Noté 3 sur 5par zekromVale, il y a 3 moisThere needs to be a CPU limit on this extension, using 30% CPU of an intel i7 11th gen laptop CPU on YouTube is ridiculous. Firefox for Ubuntu snap, flatpack, or just .deb are affected. Must disable NoScript to fix it or allow everything fully for all domains on the page. I would like more domains to be added to the global trusted list though (by default) or have a popup at the top when you first visit a page.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Hopeavirta, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Lazy Cat, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par sumobunny, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Zelgadis-San, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dadou, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 3 sur 5par aq, il y a 4 moisUser for at least 15 years, Something is conflicting on Firefox. It is blocking scripts and other add ons such as tampermonkey or violentmonkey with scripts added, but without any listing of what is being blocked. Only option is to shut it off to proceed.
Even blocking games internal scripts without any 'monkey' in use.
Please check and test - Noté 5 sur 5par Simon Bünemann, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par ADKFZ8O, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Marw, il y a 4 mois