Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
2 457 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Maximilian Hirner, il y a 8 ansMakes surfing faster and more secure. Only problem I ever had was after that one Firefox update broke it, but that's not the developers' fault.
- Noté 4 sur 5par DoubleATam, il y a 8 ansI wish that it didn't randomly stop working with no warning. Is it because it or firefox sometimes update mid-use?
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13449295 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansWorks better than intended and I can see how much google, amazon, etc spies on us.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13815882 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansVery good, but... The page must be in full screen mode for the noScript window to show the URL column so I can see what site is trusted or temp. trusted or default. Please fix this bug as I usually work with my browser in half screen.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13815672 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Chewy, il y a 8 ansLove it, but it's not really suggested for non technical users. It's much easier to use on a PC browser, it would be nice to automatically update config across devices, also would be nice to be able to look under recently blocked on my laptop and see my phone and tablet recent data. It would also be nice to have the option to group the results by page. While I'm wishing, it would be useful to see number of times blocked and temporarily allowed, but that may be a bit of a resource hog.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Not_Very_Anonymous, il y a 8 ansI tried this before and got overwhelmed by attempting to add permissions to all the sites I use. Of course, I read that initial setup could be an issue... I deleted it.
I have had this reinstalled for a month or two now and it is working fine. No slowdowns, only minor issues such as:
Finding that one site I need to give permission to so that videos play.
Not being able to block an entire domain (or not knowing how to yet at least)
Not being able wildcard whitelist things. If I go to a .edu site, I don't want to repeatedly find new scripts I need to add. I would rather whitelist all .edu sites while I'm doing what I'm doing so I can get to my required resources. (for the flamers, etc. This is my personal preference, it doesn't have to be yours. That is what flexibility in configuration is about).
Anyhow, it is still a good add-on... it just takes some adjusting to. I like the new UI and will be interested in seeing what new additions are made with it later! - Noté 5 sur 5par Painterman, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par kicho, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13803280 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansHi! Right after the FF57 Update the interface was unusable, but now, after the last updates it is nice again and I find it even better! great job!!!
One wish I have: can you add the option to only allow temporary permissions in "private mode"? I do not want to leave any traces when browsing private like it was possible on the old version. Thanks! - Noté 5 sur 5par Charlyahc, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13801775 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansStill must have despite all the webextensions limitation. To those who complaining on broken websites -- this is poweruser extension, what did you expect?
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13801836 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13801767 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansDoes exactly what it says it does and it has a clear and easy to use interface. I'm not sure what all the recent negative comments are about, but my experience with it has been good.
- Noté 5 sur 5par ezrider, il y a 8 ansTo me , this is the most important Firefox add-on. It took a while to have a mature FF 57+ version, but that's not Giorgo's fault.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 11571316 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansДля мобильной версии браузере интерфейс хорош но не идеален. А вот для версии браузера для ПК еще работать и работать...
- Noté 4 sur 5par Tacsipacsi, il y a 8 ansIt’s a great extension, although many sites simply don’t work without JavaScript, but that’s not NoScript’s fault… For now the WebExtension version finally achieved feature parity with the classic version, and even more. The only thing I really miss is a more fine-tuned XSS configuration—now I can only clear XSS choices, but I don’t even know what these choices are. Probably there are one or two sites where I want to allow suspicious requests, but I want to make sure no other sites are allowed; this is not possible at the moment.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Salsa, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13645120 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13730104 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13526282 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansOK, first release of the "new" version initially drove me mad and I uninstalled the add-on... decided to give it a chance after a while and yeee-haaa NoScript is back again! You have heard the critics and taken care of them, great thanks for that.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13781145 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13778582 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13479609 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13775915 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans