Critiques pour SingleFile
SingleFile par gildas
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15950945 de Firefox
Noté 3 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15950945 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
999 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Thomas Jung, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Enunciate_Veggie, il y a 13 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par mp, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17810758 de Firefox, il y a 16 joursAbsolument indispensable pour sauvegarder une page facilement. Le menu des préférences mériterait un peu plus de clarté.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Axolotl, il y a 20 joursAbsolute godsend in most manners the 'save selection' option is exactly what I need. However I'm running into issues with saving show/hide buttons and content it interacts with in forum pages (I can provide a link to an exact page it occurs if needed).
Broken displays be one thing but the page saver won't ever complete if these are present. A fix for this would be greatly appreciated and it would meet and exceed all my needs after. - Noté 5 sur 5par José Ángel, il y a 25 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13745328 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par woam, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Subagya, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Jaxx Thrawn, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par ADKFZ8O, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Seän "frostbyte" Shepherd, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15466444 de Firefox, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12923365 de Firefox, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Ax, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17117224 de Firefox, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par D5, il y a 5 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19251219 de Firefox, il y a 5 moisI was looking for a feature similar to Scrapbook, which was available in an earlier version of Firefox Add-on, and I am generally satisfied with SingleFile.
However, there are some areas where it falls short on pages with images.
Many pages display images in a reduced size, and when you click on them, they enlarge, but it is a bit disappointing that you cannot capture the enlarged image.
In many cases, the enlarged images are displayed in a reduced size even if they are stored in a different directory within the same domain.
If this issue were addressed, I would be very satisfied. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19242736 de Firefox, il y a 5 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par superfluosity, il y a 5 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13944616 de Firefox, il y a 5 moisThis thing does what it says it does, and super well. I'm really, really happy with how well the extension manages to capture *exactly* what is on the page. It's pretty much perfect.