Critiques pour Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube)
Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube) par code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
Avis de code-for-charity
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 4 moishi :) you have to enabled it first. Before it starts measuring. And it might needs a fix. (A future version could also analyze whats in browsing history, but that doesn't include duration / will have to guess)
What about joining us on Github? (over 170 people already contributed)
(4 stars is not, helping, reducing the average)
thanks
What about joining us on Github? (over 170 people already contributed)
(4 stars is not, helping, reducing the average)
thanks
776 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Yevhen Tretiakov, il y a un jour
- Noté 3 sur 5par stapuft, il y a 6 joursWorks allright, but on mobile, you have tonswitch to "desktop mode" to make some features work, like automatically redirecting from the shitty "shorts" page to the actual YouTube page for the video.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 joursHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will.
This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering).
The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here.) - Noté 5 sur 5par Lakyn, il y a 9 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par MetalGear89, il y a 9 joursFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19465923 de Firefox, il y a 13 joursThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 jourshi! youtube changing is not an issue we share every day. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18989911 de Firefox, il y a 13 jours
- Noté 2 sur 5par TS, il y a 16 joursIt's very hit or miss if any of its features actually work on mobile. The interface is trash and the prevent autoplay toggle blocks the video from loading entirely.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 jourshi! This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15037318 de Firefox, il y a 17 joursIt does not even allow me to watch youtube videos after I had installed it!
Test it before making it available! - Noté 3 sur 5par ueeu, il y a 18 joursVery good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UI
Edit: CPU usage wise I think so, but it seems to also interfere with page loading, most of the time for me it's a blank pageRéponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 joursYou mean full replacement UI?
There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox. - Noté 5 sur 5par Vangxim, il y a 20 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par SzymonL, il y a 20 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17491097 de Firefox, il y a 21 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Cboom, il y a 23 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ivia Relle, il y a 23 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Hoàng Hải Hậu, il y a un mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16779275 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par coldcoffee, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19298834 de Firefox, il y a un moisMakes YouTube usable again!
- Noté 1 sur 5par DOT, il y a un mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19242234 de Firefox, il y a un moisThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 24 joursHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We can also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).